English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Yes the intelligent Americans will vote for anyone but her, but the idiots have taken over so she may win

2006-12-14 23:28:25 · answer #1 · answered by MsFancy 4 · 6 1

Well, if someone like Bill Frist or Sam Brownback is on the republican ticket, any intelligent american would vote for ANYONE else. The major republicans under consideration right now will all follow a policy so close to Bush´s it would be like having him for another 4 years. I don´t think we can trash this country much more with the route we have been going. Change is needed.

P.S.
Sillary Clinton. That is just pathetic. Grow up and leave the kindergarten wit at home.

2006-12-15 11:27:02 · answer #2 · answered by phoenixbard2004 3 · 0 0

She couldn't do any worse than the narrow-minded leadership we have in office now. Even though she voted to support the war and voted for the appropriation of funds for the war, she at least has admitted those were mistakes, that this war has been a misguided, ill-run adventure, and the whole premise was based on lies-after-lies. Don''t underestimate her. She's an iron maiden with nerves of steel. She is highly intelligent and would make a good leader. I have met her several times in NY and Washington DC, and find her to have character, a sense of humor, and most importantly, she is opened to advice from Republicans and Democrats alike. I do believe she not only has authored a few books, but she has even read more than one in her lifetime, and I'm sure those didn't have cartoons in them. She would be a vast improvement over W "Mission Accomplished" Bush.

2006-12-15 08:19:51 · answer #3 · answered by gone 6 · 0 1

Go Rudi!

I read a recent article on the strenghts of potential candidates, and it had pretty much predicted that she didn't have a real leg to stand on, Americans don't want another Clinton government, so I see the chances of her being elected as very weak. Really, unless we get better candidates, I don't think people will go out and vote. Also, being from Chicago, no way I would vote for Obama. Not to mention the fact that his first name rhymes with iraq, his middle name is an exact match to a recently ousted leader.. and the last name just has to ryhme with osama. Really, that combination coming up for presidency, what are the odds, definitely got the anti-christ with us.

2006-12-15 07:39:21 · answer #4 · answered by Craig 4 · 0 1

Don't insult Hillary Clinton. It only reduces whatever credibility you have. Her supporters will use it against ALL of her opponents and the rest of us are not impressed. Since I doubt you are seriously seeking an answer, I'll allow you to make the obvious conclusion from what I have already said.

2006-12-15 09:16:10 · answer #5 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0 0

I really don't think that the Democrats are putting forward a single candidate who's qualified to be President, including Clinton. It's my personal belief that she has ulterior motives for wanting the presidency, and at the top of that list would be her opportunity to show her philandering husband that she's as good as he is. Unfortunately, that's probably true. She's be about as good as that jackass was.

2006-12-15 09:57:23 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

Personally I support Rudi Giuliani, but would vote for Hillary over Obama or Edwards. I think those 2 would trash this country more than Hillary.

2006-12-15 07:31:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The News Media and the Rich & Powerful have already decided that Hillary will be the next president. That was decided years ago.
Hillary is evil, BUT I would support her over John Edwards, shyster lawyer, and Obama Hussein, hypocrite.
HILLARY SUPPORTS BUSH IN IRAQ.

2006-12-15 07:34:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I noticed that the the supposed "intelligent" voters who would *not* vote for Hilary Clinton were those who couldn't figure out comma usage, proper grammar, or spelling.

I think you answered your own question in a way unintended. Hilary won't be selected because of her polarizing views and her gender, not because people are smart. They voted for the moronic offspring of Bush, didn't they? Anyone who considers him "inteligent" is probably suspect themselves, eh?

2006-12-15 07:32:54 · answer #9 · answered by concierge1nvs 2 · 0 3

I wish the intelligent people at Yahoo Answers would work to keep this site free of silly demagoguers, like yourself.

2006-12-15 07:27:51 · answer #10 · answered by Privatize 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers