There are advantages to being a small fish in a big pond; take it from me, I'm a natural expert. I'd choose the Senate, work my way on to an important committee, and later seek a leadership position. It's time for Congress to take back some of the powers that have been usurped by the Executive, and I'd enjoy being a part of that movement.
2006-12-15 02:54:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Red Herring 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would think that would depend on your motive for becoming either. A Governor is a leader and a manager. A Senator is an overseer and a ponderer. If I had the ambition to become President some way I would seek a governorship to get the experience. Governors make better presidents. The last Senator who was elected President from the Senate was Kennedy, and although he was adored by a lot of people, he wasn't very good at his job.
2006-12-15 08:29:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Governor. You're sorta like president of a state, which is cool. You get to live in an awesome mansion, and, generally are less scrutinized than a senator is nationally (depending on the state, CA, NY, NJ and CT are exempted). Plus you have better odds of eventually becomming POTUS
2006-12-15 06:42:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Owen 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Be a king of a state but a big one. A governor is the big boss in a state who controls all the activities within the boundaries.
2006-12-15 06:46:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
definitely a senator, they make killer money, can vote themselves a raise and have few working days a year.
2006-12-15 06:43:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by hardhead 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
better benies as senator,and lots of soft money
2006-12-15 06:37:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by thankuberry 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
it doesn't matter , every four years your seat is up for grabs and I never had that many people trying to grab my seat
2006-12-15 06:37:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋