i recently requested a traffic and engeneering survey from caltrans because i was cited with a vc22350 of the california vehicle code and turns out none exist. so i am wanting to know how i can sue the city/state for a refund to all motorist who were cited with that infraction and radar lidar or any speed detecting device was used to determine there speed. california vc 22350 is a basic speed law and the speed trap argument is used for vc22350 and is illegal persuant to california vc40801,40802,40803,40804,40805 who can i sue and how.i want no money i want everyone ticketed to be refunded there money as its illegal and the city that they gave them in is small and they use most of the money for revenue
2006-12-14 21:12:33 · 6 answers · asked by 06tiburon 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Good Luck, the government controls everything!!!
Don't you see there are 33 state prison in California and all of them are so over crowded that they are sending our prisoners to other states.
Guess what they can do to you for giving them a hard time for this. (unless your white, than you have a chance)
2006-12-14 21:22:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
if it is in the Calif. state traffic law then it is a leg. law. so i would check the actually enforcement book.. In AZ we call it the ARS or Arizona Revised Statue Book. Make sure you have the correct language in the book. As far a suing it may be an individual basis, since some may just plea guilty. But Calif like most other state have a program of para-legals and can give you free advice.
2006-12-14 21:55:03 · answer #2 · answered by fire 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why are you making the excellence "non-community"? in case you have been referred to for going seventy one and the area pointed out is the area of the line it relatively is the two-lane ingredient of the line, then 22349(b) could prepare. (do no longer understand why you will not additionally be referred to decrease than (a), on the grounds that at seventy one mph you would be breaking that regulation too.) area (c) factors you to a protection, even nonetheless it is not an absolute protection. The language isn't mandatory and leaves very much of discretion to the state and county. There may be in simple terms a million sign, miles at the back of you, and it relatively is going to be sufficient. As for the fee catch, extra information are mandatory appropriate to the officer's events in monitoring this street.
2016-10-14 23:56:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Talk to a lawyer about the feasibility of your endeavor. The quality of your lawyer will probably decide whether you can win or not.
If you can catch the government doing something illegal, I say call them on it, and let them know that US citizens are not the sheep that they think they are.
2006-12-14 21:27:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
good luck the state controls the courts they will find away to toss your case out.
2006-12-14 21:16:23 · answer #5 · answered by scooprandell 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
See you in Guantanamo thank you for voting Republican.
2006-12-14 21:46:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋