please help me in this damn question : 1+1=0,2+2=0,3+5=0,6+8=3,8+8=4,9+7=1,11+567=1,680+369=?

Question

1+1=0
2+2=0
3+5=0
6+8=3
8+8=4
9+7=1
11+567=1
680+369=?

thanks anyone who spend a little time on my problem

I want the answer of : 680 + 369

Answer 1

THE NO 369 HAS 3 NOS --3,6,9. 3HAS NO CIRCLE IN IT,6 HAS 1 CIRCLE IN IT,9 HAS 1 CIRCLES IN IT SO TOTAL NO OF CIRCLES=2. SIMILARLY , NO 680 HAS 4 CIRCLES. THEREFORE , 680+369=4+2
=6

Answer 2

if you assume all equations are true, the left side of the equations are all variables represented by numbers, the right side are answers in real numbers, that 0=0 and that variables like 567 are indicative of the appropriate number holding the place in the one, ten or hundred collumn respectively, then:
1=0
2=0
3=0
4=?
5=0
6=1
7= -9
8=2
9=10
therefore 680+369= (1 hundreds+2 tens+0 ones)+
(0 hundreds+1 tens+10 ones)=120+20=140
I think your answer is 140, but I'm probably wrong

wow, in the time it took me to type this up I and see the answers above me I now think I'm really really wrong.

Answer 3

Tanktunker is a genius.

However, your delivery of the question was horrible. To declare 1 + 1 to equal 0 means we can only assume you're using mathematical rules.

Would have been much better to have
f(1) + f(1) = 0
f(2) + f(2) = 0

because we're actually doing something to the function. In fact, we can define it to be the "loop" function L.

Answer 4

680+369=6
It's the amount of circles in the shape of the number.

Answer 5

well after starring at it forever and trying to find a pattern, i have to agree to tanktunker... the number of circles seems to fit accordingly

Answer 6

I see several equations that are incorrect. What exactly are you expecting us to do?

Answer 7

No idea, I'm sorry. I can't find a pattern.