Will you be watching The National Geographic special on Jesus Sunday?

Question

I probably will; likely record it.

What do you know and think of it?

Answer 1

No, I most likely will not. I have many good books to read, and even though I have high regard for the programs (that are not about animals) on NG, I somehow feel yet another (I saw Godspell, I saw Jesus Christ superstar, I saw the NG/Discovery program on the DaVinci Code) program on Jesus isn't what I need to watch. I still prefer to read about (and watch programs on) matters and affairs of humanity.

Answer 2

If his call became Simon, he wasn't the first Jesus. Even Jesus wasn't the first "Jesus," as that became a hardship-free call (Yeshua) yet Jesus, the single referred to in the recent testomony, is the Messiah. And no, it would not reason me to question my ideals, because there is not any historic information that Simon fairly became resurrected, while the manuscript credibility of the recent testomony is sound and does function unique documentation of the life, lack of life and resurrection of Jesus. _____________ From the NG internet website: " a three-foot-tall stone pill from the first century B.C. would communicate of an early Messiah and his resurrection..." The clue that this isn't a clinical discovery is the qualifying note, "would." this implies they have not stumbled on some thing that proves some thing. Ergo: My Christian faith is unbroken.

Answer 3

I'd like to see it, it looks sort of interesting, but my fiance is a hardcore believer in Jesus and he is offended that they are trying to say that he was never on the cross. So, we will probably skip it, since it will only make him angry.

Answer 4

There's so many books and programs about Jesus, yet no one seems to read his story from the Bible.

Answer 5

non