I put this up agin because the other one needed a lot of correction, grammer & such.
This is my life quote, for those not aware what the free world is, its is a bunch of things. I made it up in high school, It was made originally for the name of my group of ppl I hung out with, and I named it free world after WWE superstar Joh Cena's word life theme. Now it stands for who I am because those kids who were the free world are all gone besides me. Anyway tell me what you think of my speech.
I am the free world, I am the word of life I believe in my own morals and values, I judge on my standards, I do not believe what I have not seen or heard, I do not lie about matters that do not concern me, what I do is my business & only my own.
You are confused at what I am,I do not fall under any of your catagories do I? Understand this even if you don't get anything else, I consider myself the king of kings & I shall not change who I am or what I represent for any of you motherfukas- My free world
2006-12-14 16:59:21 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
BTW its trying to say freedom is you, you judge where you go & what the boundries are, not others, you follow your own rules, even though the chains of society has already grounded you, get it?
2006-12-14 17:00:36 · update #1
Lol your argument is contradictory. You can't just say that you encompass freedom and still maintain that the society you are within has bounded you.
I think you are confounding a famous quote by Rousseau, "man is free, but everywhere he is in chains" What this means is not your contradictory argument. Rather it means there exists something called civic freedom, where men entering into a social contract become more free then their former primitive state, despite the fact that they now exist in a world of laws. This freedom is illustrated through a pursual of the good and understanding the nature of man. It seems obvious that every sane man would want the best for himself. Rousseau argues that in a social contract man will see that being bound by the chains of society can bring about the best possible goods for his goals (these goals are understood through a stronger rendering of his state of nature, a task I do not have the time for). Because it affords him the protection of politics--among other things.
Before beginning an inquiry like this you need to understand what it is to be free. If freedom is the pursual of goals then man is most free when bound. But you can't just come out and say that man can disregard the social structures that exist and still want to be apart of the society.
2006-12-14 17:20:36 · answer #1 · answered by jazzman1127 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Joey,. this is the problem of the world TODAY.. You , yourself have changed it to version 2 in such a short time.So the others are also are lining up their own version of the Free world.
" I will keep my world clean and I will push away the dirt and the filth on to the road from my world " is not the ideal one. So long as we are all in ONE COMMON HOME .. the world.... we have some mutual responsibities and committments.
There is one other world... Free world... that is totally yours and you can do anything with it. That is your inner world. Establish that.
2006-12-14 17:26:34 · answer #2 · answered by YD 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a truly free world is possible where there are free movements of labour, capital and intelligence between any two places. it is possible if governments restrictions regarding immigration, trade, etc do not exit. it is utopian concept. A truly free world hence can never exist
2006-12-14 17:08:07 · answer #3 · answered by blue h 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It ended when Adam and Eve ate the apple from the Tree of Knowledge.
2006-12-14 17:48:41 · answer #4 · answered by Alfretz T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"agin" "grammer" "Joh Cena"
i think its time for version 3.0
2006-12-14 17:09:21 · answer #5 · answered by Spiderpig 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋