should the voting age be lowerd to 14?

Answer 1

Yes, a profound yes.

several of the reasons to deny people the right to vote based on age:

1. Maturity. Most people aren't mature enough to vote before they're 18 (or above) And since 18-20 year olds hardly ever vote, not many even younger will exercise their right to vote.

refutation: Maturity is not dependent on age. many of Voting age are still not fully mature, while many who are not yet of voting age are. Besides, if the immature ones will never use their right to vote, is that not a good thing as then only the Mature ones will vote?

2. Children will vote exactly like their parents.

refutation: Not true and not a reason. In Utah, the Kid's vote results would have elected a democratic governor instead of the republican. In Florida, Jeb Bush would have been denied a second term as governor.
Also, this is not a reason to deny somebody the vote. Many full adults vote exactly as their parents would vote, despite (theoretically) being able to make their own choice. If we use age as an argument, then this is not a valid argument.
Also, to assume a child would vote exactly the same way as their parents in guaranteed secrecy, does not follow with any parent's experience.

those are a few popular claims. However, I would have to say that we should remove age from the equaision altogether- replace it with a basic constitutional literacy test, or a 4 question government test.

Q1. Who is the Vice President of the United States?
Q2. Who is the Governor of your State?
Q3. who represents you in congress? (3 possible answers)
Q4. Who is the chief justice of the Supreme Court?

Answer key (for me)

A1. Richard (Dick) Cheney
A2. Mike Easley
A3. Elizabeth Dole, Richard Burr, and Brad Miller
A4. John Roberts.

Lower the age, or get rid of it and use the test. otherwise you have people who are affected by government policy (what person in school is going to vote for a supporter of No Child left Behind? they know the effects firsthand).

Our youth have no say about education or health care though both affect them now. The Reason 18 year olds were added was because they could be drafted without a say about the draft.


And I wonder- who here could guess my age?

Answer 2

tough question, and Ican see both sides of the argument

undoubtedly and avg 14 yr old is more kowledgeable and has access to more information now than an avg 14 yr old back when the current voting age was set up.

on the other hand, how many people utilize their right to vote? and more than that how many actually think and vote rather than vote along party lines and on a single issue e.g. gay mariage or abortion, as if that will solve social security or health crises.

I say, it would not hurt, maybe ower it to 16 first see how it goes and then lower it to 14 if teh first phase showed good results

Answer 3

you're not to any extent further stupid to initiate a relations at 17? some can own a vehicle at 15, does that cause them to no longer stupid? some may have a job at 16, does that recommend that they don't look to be stupid? No, it truly is okay were it truly is at because whats one extra 12 months? Legally you're counted as an individual at 18, at 17 you're legally able to be married yet you're nevertheless no longer seen an individual till 18. it truly is a peculiar regulation yet it truly is what it truly is. At 18 you're responsible on your movements, heck 18 use to be the eating age and for a guy to get married to a lady with out the dad and mom consent is eighteen now the lady must be 17 leagally, yet at 17 you're nevertheless a baby and why ought to you've extra rights than all and dissimilar else. Hip, Hip, Horray, so what in case you may have the funds for a house, no longer many 17 12 months olds can, shall we gloat about that as a lot as achievable. all and dissimilar has a concepts, (its bizarre its like we were born with it), and making a assertion of your no longer stupid is a stretch, there's a good type of belongings you do not somewhat comprehend. purely because you may do all of this stuff does no longer recommend that you're sensible, because i comprehend you've heard it before, the in problem-free words sensible element to do is to end college and get an excellent occupation so that you'll boost and preserve your relations, thats good that's the neatest element someone can do. the in problem-free words those which will probable believe you're different 17 12 months olds that sense they're no longer childern purely wait on extra 12 months and get off your intense horse. At 17 achievable visit Juvee once you're 18 it truly is the detention center somewhat at 18 you're responsible for your self and your movements and believe me one extra 12 months till you are able to vote on something is okay, it received't kill you.

Answer 4

In the British Merchant navy a 'boy' is (or at least in the old days was) considered to be an adult at the age of 15. I was entitled to vote, enter into legally binding contracts and even to marry at that age. Ever heard the expression "right of passage" well now You know what it means. The kids of today are far too immature to be given the "right" (it is actually both a privilege and an honor) of the vote. They cannot even "vote" for their favorite contestant on a reality show without abusing the process, (how many times can you ring in to vote?).

Answer 5

Chris M & Gaurdia... hit the nail on the head

Age is overrated, there could be a 14year old who knows more about politics and the world then a 40year old voter

either way, like Chris said age shouldn't be part of what qualifies you to vote, a test should be given to determine whether or not your suitable to vote

Answer 6

No! For no reason would I want a 14 year old casting a vote that could help choose the future. What do you know at 14 that makes you think you need to vote?

Answer 7

I personally feel that age is a terrible method for measuring one's qualification to vote. I honestly feel there should be some level of competency test at the voting locations. This is simply to ensure that voting members understand not only the importance of the action but understand what the canidates stand for. If at 14 you understand all of that, I am all for it.

Answer 8

no....think of this how can a 14 year old make a decision to vote for a president? I understand that there are smart 14 year olds out there. It does not make any sense at all.

Answer 9

Heavens, no. I there are 30 year olds that don't know enough about the government to make an educated voted. But at least at 18 you have had basic government classes.

Answer 10

Why not? Fourteen-year olds (and younger) are determining public school policy in the U.S. today. Public school teachers are not allowed to reprimand, discipline, or determine any consequences for a student's classroom behavior, refusal to accept classroom assignments or homework. I think we should lower the voting age to six, maybe even four!

Maybe two or three-year olds could even turn their parents into the government for failing to put the peanut butter and jelly proportianally on their sandwiches!