English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-14 16:19:33 · 15 answers · asked by NONAME CLONE 1 in Politics & Government Politics

Blah blah blah blah. You all have turds rolling out of your mouth.

2006-12-14 16:32:50 · update #1

15 answers

Neither are remotely connected, neolib!

2006-12-14 16:22:06 · answer #1 · answered by El Bubba 3 · 4 4

Get a life already. This is the dumbest comparison I have seen on Q&A & that says alot about how dumb it is. Hitler was a mad man who tried to kill off an entire race & then dominate the world. President Bush went in to try to destory weapons of mass destruction, most of which had been move to other friendly terrorist countries. 2 yrs before Bush "started" his "plan" the UN issued what they called a "final warning" to Iraq. Iraq refused to comply so the US (Bush) helped them get rid of weapons ensuring the safety of several countries. Anyone with sense would assume that President Bush's agenda made more sense.
Can you please make sense next time?

2006-12-15 00:31:25 · answer #2 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 2 1

Lets see.
Bush-Defend our country from Islamofascists terrorists.
Hitler- Conquer the world, murder all the Jews & other people he didn't aproove of.

I can see how you have trouble deciding. Any decent, rational person has no trouble with this 1.

OK, I'll give you a little hint. Bush makes more sense.

2006-12-15 00:31:39 · answer #3 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2 1

Well to you, Hitler's would since you support Hitler and his genocidal behavior...Bush is spreading freedom, something that you don't care about and take for granted...Since you are for the killing of innocent people...you would feel right at home in Iran...but then again their president rejects that the holocaust happened and it's something you support so there might be some conflict there.

2006-12-15 00:30:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

i'm gonna go with hitler merely because i'm a proud white man with only german and austrian ancestry and would be cool with being one of those left alive. and at least hitler had the support of his people.

2006-12-15 00:33:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

after reading this i have converted to democrat!! they make a lot of sense.

cough cough

2006-12-15 01:10:48 · answer #6 · answered by ghggj g 1 · 1 0

I heard Hitler is your daddy!

2006-12-15 00:35:09 · answer #7 · answered by Brianne 7 · 0 0

Great,another liberal joins the ranks,and as usual has nothing relevent to offer.

2006-12-15 00:23:18 · answer #8 · answered by Mr Bellows 5 · 4 3

at least hitler was honest about his plans... and im speaking as a jew! i dont believe a word that comes out of that monkey's mouth. they're both evil but bush mastered the "im retarded" act to hide the evil.

2006-12-15 00:26:59 · answer #9 · answered by angela 2 · 1 6

Hitler at least had a plan - Bush has none!

2006-12-15 00:23:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 5

fedest.com, questions and answers