English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

---------------------------

But the impact on new capacity of higher spending is being blunted by rising costs. Expressed in *cost inflation-adjusted terms*, investment in 2006 is only 5% above that in 2000.

2006-12-14 14:30:52 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Economics

3 answers

It means real returns which you subtract out inflation.

eg. Return is 10% and inflation is 3%, real return/inflation-adjusted return = 7%

2006-12-14 14:35:01 · answer #1 · answered by feanor 7 · 0 0

Actual rate-inflation rate gives the real rate. What it says in your question is, in 2000 dollars the 2006 'capacity of higher spending' is only 5% above 2000 level.

2006-12-15 04:07:53 · answer #2 · answered by Mathew C 5 · 0 0

properly, they are evaluating investments between the two years, and shall we's say investments between the 6 years bigger by ability of a definite proportion. That distinction although looks bigger than that's, because of the fact it does not evaluate increasing costs and inflation between the six years, so as that they re-alter this to in basic terms a real 5% improve.

2016-12-11 09:25:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers