why send condolezza rice to talk to leaders of countrys that wont even let women drive?to anger them?why?

Question

are we trying to jam our way of life down there throats? you would have to assume they wont respect her. if im trying to get someone to eat ham i would not send a muslim or jew as a messenger

Answer 1

You just put the non in non sequiter.
Condi Rice is our Secretary of State- our top diplomat. Are you saying that we should let these people pick OUR leaders?
They are trying to deprive us of life. My question is why we talk to them at all. We should just destroy them.

Answer 2

Majority of Saudi Princes are American Educated they and their wives live like Americans.But they force the Wahabiism down the throat of ordinary citizens to keep them selves in Power.Condoleesa will be fine over there .They know they are under American protection no bones about it.

Answer 3

no longer all Muslim countries stress women into insignificant status. Pakistan once had a lady accurate minister! Plus the countries we are negotiating with, they favor to seek for suggestion from from human beings on the accurate of the totem pole. no longer some nameless, faceless diplomatic bureaucrat, even with the undeniable fact that the Secretary of State and the Speaker of the abode, 2 of the most seen and effectual human beings in our authorities. So in a way it truly is a praise to them. besides, there's a precedent for this. lower back in the course of the Nixon/Ford years there replaced right into a large nationwide argument over even if we would want to continually actually have diplomatic kinfolk with South Africa because of their coverage of apartheid. The Democrats idea we would want to continually purely boycott them. The Republicans universal 'functional engagement', the concept we would want to continually preserve kinfolk with them in hopes of convincing them that apartheid replaced into incorrect. The ambassador Nixon despatched to South Africa replaced into black! (I ignore now who it replaced into. no longer Julian Bond. no longer Andrew youthful. i ought to seem it up.)

Answer 4

Because they want to drag this thing out for as long as they can. Remember Kissinger and the shape of the table thing while our boys were being killed in 'Nam. The more things change, the more they stay the same and so long as there is big money to be made, life has little value.

Answer 5

The Bush administration is as bad as the Clinton admin. Neither listen to what the enemy says. The enemy already made it clear what they want. They want us to conform to their Islamic beliefs and ways. That's all there is to it. Yet, Bush and Rice assume all the muslin's want is to listen to the bilingual intelligence of their enemy.

Answer 6

On your response to my question... Saddam was the WMD in Iraq, I don't have children fighting in Iraq and thanks to Bush I probably never will, and your tone about "why is it our problem"... because we as a nation have the power to help, but selfish people like you are always to myopic. Grow up!

Answer 7

How could you presume to know what they will and won't respect. They know our ways are not their ways.

Isn't she a US representative? Our representative should be representative of our ideals, not theirs.

You could have said the same about Madelaine, btw.

Answer 8

possibly to show them that women are capable of everything a man is on the world's political stage. but, i would think it is because of political loyalty, her to him and him to her.

Answer 9

Condi is the best person for the job, whether you like it or not.

Answer 10

I havent liked her since I first laid eyes on the b*thc. She has to be one of the worst and stupidist ever!!!