Anything is possible. We don't live in a world where people are principled or have a conscience, generally. Things can also happen outside a person beyond their control if what they are involved in is large and internecine as government. Look at our own. And any before it.
2006-12-14 12:20:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by vanamont7 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
I believe the Queen has a lot more money than the photographers who were racing with Diana's chaeuffeur, who as I understand it was drinking. You try doing that, same vehicle and conditions, you are apt to end up just as dead, being "rich" and "important" doesn't make you immune to the laws of physics even if it does allow you to escape traffic violation tickets. They were doing something stupid an it got them killed, just like young Kennedy flying his plane into the ocean. Safety rules were not made just to seperate peasants from royalty, they're made to keep people from endangering their own lives and those of others. It's not like they have immortality and it takes a powerful conspiracy to kill them. I mean, why wouldn't they have gotten rid of Fergie first if they were trying to prevent embarrassment of the family? I think people need to stop believing in fairy tales. And that greiving father needs to give up the idea of forcing his way into the Royal family and be satisfied with his estates in Ross. Or go back where he came from, which the more of an issue he makes of this, the more everyone wishes he would.
And PS - I always thought her nose was too big.
2006-12-14 12:36:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Of course I do and before you ask, no I do not have proof. However, anyone who thinks the Royals won't kill one of their own needs to brush on their history and Diana wasn't one of the royals anyway.
Let's see what we do know. There is no way Diana would be allowed to marry a Muslim and have him be the step-father of the future king. And that day Dodi had bought a ring for her.
Tony Blair was first in line behind the USA to go to war and stay there. This is to pay back a favor to the CIA for their help in her death. MI5 needed to distance themselves so it was contracted to the CIA for help in a war Bush had already decided was going to happen.
The government will lie to protect their own interests. Look at all the lies about Iraq. Do you honestly think they won't lie about a killing. That's what the CIA and MI5 do. They kill people in ways that look like accidents. And why did it take so long to get her to the hospital? Do you think if Prince big ears was in the car it would have taken so long?
The only camera that could have recorded the accident was the only one not working. There was a white car seen that has disappeared.
2006-12-14 14:20:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by al p 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
No I dont much as I loved Diana I do not believe it was anything but a tragic accident that was caused by the paparazzi.
2006-12-14 17:26:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by molly 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't think that the British government would waste the resources and money to kill Diana off. I mean, she wasn't even doing anything, Charles instigated everything.
2006-12-14 12:25:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
For goodness sake, let the woman rest in peace. She allowed herself to be a passenger in a car driven by a drunk, and was doubly irresponsible by failing to wear a seatbelt. Let's accept it was an entirely avoidable accident, and get on with our lives. In their brief existences, by sheer accident of birth, Diana and Dodi had more earthly riches, priveleges and pleasures than most would enjoy in twenty lifetimes, so let's not get too maudlin, please.
2006-12-14 13:34:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by obanlassie 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
No. Everyone loved Diana, I doubt anyone would seriously want to kill her. Anyone that thinks that conspiracy is real should seriously die too...
2006-12-14 12:19:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think the truth will be forever hidden from all of us. She was a beautiful person that left us all missing a special angel
2006-12-14 12:20:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by rose v 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
No.She died in an accident because the driver was speeding,had been drinking,using prescription drugs and she wasn't wearing a seat belt.
2006-12-14 12:21:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by rosbif 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, never did. The investigation report was on the news tonight, did you see it? Their conclusion was that it was a tragic accident, nothing more.
2006-12-14 12:21:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by leslie 6
·
2⤊
1⤋