According to Herodotus, it was over reciprocal bride-theft. At the beginning of the Histories, he considers the story of Zeus' pursuit of Europa (with Paris' kidnap of Helen as a kind of retaliation) as a veiled reference to practices of kidnapping by settlers forming colonies on both sides in order to have wives (the Danes did something similar in taking Irish and English women once they had settled Iceland). Tom Holland's Persian Fire suggests that it was largely territorial expansion by the Persian empire, as well as Greek expansion of colonies in Asia Minor. A series of small conflicts in which Greece was successful - alarming to the Persians, who were much more powerful, sophisticated and wealthy - suggested to the Persian emperor that invading Greece would put paid to what he saw as rebellion. Northern Greeks who got a bad deal from the emerging city-states such as Athens and Peloponnesians oppressed by Sparta supported the Persian incursion, as it would depose reigning oligarchies and bring many benefits.
2006-12-14 11:04:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When the Persians attacked & attempted to control Asia Minor where many Greek (Ionian) colonies are located, the Greeks sent help to resist the Persians.
As a punitive measure (or revenge, if you will), Xerxes decide to invade Greece to punish the Greek city states for their roles in the resistance.
2006-12-15 00:18:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kevin F 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Greeks had colonies in coastal Turkey, Persian empire expanded from Iran into Turkey...
their cultures came into contact and so naturally came into conflict with one another. There was also a great deal of cooperation and coexistence, not just conflict
2006-12-14 11:03:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cornelius O 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
@ Anvil yours is a regularly occurring Israeli answer to a question you don't like ie by insulting the consumer who requested that sensible question . this must be a area for questions and solutions no longer one to throw airborne dirt and dust because you are able to't face the reality. Now to respond to your good question > There are in problem-free words 2 ideas to positioned an end to this conflict and that is by communique. Israel has to sit down down with Hamas and concede a good type of land they occupy, boost the blockade of Gaza, positioned the entire od the West monetary employer lower than Palestinian administration and eliminate all its military from that section and a minimum of initiate the go back of Palestinians pushed out by the Zionists. A bitter pill to swallow yet when Israel somewhat needs peace then they ought to swallow it. Hamas on the different hand would ought to guarantee to quit all hostilities once and for each and each and every of the alternative is to get the US and the UN in contact to stress Israel to regulate to situations proper to the down trodden Palestinians as in my opinion Israel does no longer choose peace till it has occupied the entire of Palestine
2016-11-26 19:55:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by sprang 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Power. Two tuff guys on the block. Each standing in the other's way in their plans of conquest.
2006-12-14 11:03:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by robert m 7
·
0⤊
1⤋