Would we be better off if the nazi's had won ww2?

Question

With the way our economy is in Britain would we be better off?

Aryan is often seen as blonde haired blue eyed this is wrong. iT IS A TERM MEANT TO MEAN HIGHER BEING and I believe the aryans were from Tibet/Nepal.

Anyhow I do have blonde hair and blue eyes!

Answer 1

No. Don't be silly. However we'd be better off if idiots could use capital letters and apostrophes.

Answer 2

I have blond hair and blue eyes, but there is no way that I would think that we would be better off if the Nazi's had won WW2, quite a few people like you get carried away with this idea, Himmler sent people all over trying to find Aryan artifacts and to establish proof of the Aryan race and superiority, he failed in this quest and had to make the whole thing up to feed the general public and make them believe that they were linked to this mythology of the Teutonic super being, this is only a small part of the madness that you think we would have been better off with, these people were not experts in economics, they were fanatical murderers, who lied to their own people, their whole ideology was built on hate, and how can you even suggest such a thing after your own country men fought and died so bravely to stop this complete madman in his tracks, all this so ungrateful brainless arses like you could talk utter rubbish, you clearly have no concept of the horror that took place in those dark days, you might not just be here today, blond hair blue eyes or not, to be so freely asking such a question, had things turned out differently, dumb jerk!!!!

Answer 3

THIS IS DEEP!! But I guess we'll NEVER know, History being History and all that..
I might suggest that we'd ALL be singing from the same songsheet and a unified Nazi Europe would be a power to rival the US but I think I'd be deluding myself. Do YoU really think the US would let that happen? Following ww2 the US CLAIMED large swaithes of Europe (as thier prize) the last remaining example was Berlin....we're they just holding back the Red Hordes that for 40 years thereafter threatened? Or were they getting a foothold in Europe?? That's open to debate....but I wouldn,t mid a bet on the latter.

Answer 4

Well, since much is relative, it is hard to say.
Hitler was a crazed murderous maniac. I don't think anyone like that would be fit to run countries. Look how much he destroyed of Europe. It is hard to say all these years later if the Muslims would flood into Europe anyway.

A better question would be, would it be better if Hitler's Germany never existed at all. Jews create wealth for their countries ( a known fact), and there would be NO Muslim problem, the Jews would be enough incentive to keep them out of Europe all together, especially France and Germany. One may even speculate that if there were no Hitler, there would be no Muslim terrorists fighting a Jihad against the West???
Who knows.

Answer 5

No, not by a long way.
In fact last year you had the German chancellor phone in on radio 2 saying they'd love to join pound stirling.
The biggest mistake we made at the end of the war was not to redevelop our industry sufficiently.
We thought what we had had done the job and did'nt take the long view as was adopted by many of our then enemies.
Most contries in Europe are screwin over the Euro.
The best thing we ever did was be on on our own. At least then we have some modecome of control.
It's our government thats killing our industry with to high a levvy placed on business. There is no incentive for companies to remain and were once again becoming a trading post instead of a player.

Answer 6

You must be joking! and whats all this crap "the way our country is"? people like you make me sick!...
Anyone would think its suddenly turned into a banana republic!. You wanna take a damn good look around and see the woods for the trees, the UK is booming and is far more prosperous than ever before. Its a great place to live its a great place to work and its the best country there is anyway!.

Oh and in answer to your question. The Nazi never had an hope in hell of wining the 2nd world war, once Hitler had made the mistake of attacking Russia his days where numbered, Stalin would have committed every last Russian soldier to defeat Hitler and in probability he'd have marched right across Europe and we'd all be speaking Russian by now..

Answer 7

Are you just simply dillutional? Do you think the Nazi's had a solid economic strategy? Do you believe this was the top of their priority list. Their money came from raping and stealing from other countries. Let's just say for argument that Britian would have been better off, the only person that would have been allowed to enjoy their occupation, would have been a blonde hair, blue-eyed aryan. To simply answer, no!
EDIT
Hey good for you, now grow up and get a life. Nazis lost, Hitler dead, move on.

Answer 8

There are several points to consider here.
In no particular order of importance

One of the reasons they lost was that the Nazi's spectacularly mismanaged the German economy. For example, they would not allow women to work, they wasted resources like aluminium steel and oil. When Erhard Milch did a survey on how to save Aluminium desperately needed for aircraft production he found companies making green houses and stepladders from the metal. Their aero engine industry was a complete mess, as indeed was their air-plane manufacturing industry. They produced a few good planes yes. . but many more absolute turkeys. . the same, to a lesser extent, is true of tanks.

And you are asking if we would be better off under them?

And of course, the fact is that we are not German and they had the nasty habit of using forced labour from invaded countries, working in hideous conditions, to boost their wretched war effort,

Maybe you think that is better?

Or maybe you see yourself as helping to organize the train loads of your countrymen being sent off to forced labour?

Look around you friend, you live in one of the most prosperous parts of the world, I dare say you eat regularly, have fresh water and I know, a priori, that you have internet access.

You need to read a lot, learn how to think, then think a lot, and you wouldn't ask such tomfool questions.

Answer 9

Well. It depends, compare fascism with the ike of communism. I think, in that alternate world, the Nazi-German empire wouldn't have lasted even half as long as the USSR, so in that aspect it would've been better for Eastern Europe, as well as for, of course, Finland who was attacked by the USSR without provocation.

Answer 10

surely not - it is far better than Germany's, and at least we have our own government and Queen and national pride. The unemployment rate in Germany is far far higher than ours, and their laws for employment draconian and policed very highly. It has lead to being a very frustrating time for German companies. - The going rate for a building labourer is 52 euros an hour - simply because they have to be employed full time and one has to allow for all the hours without work when charging out for a job. Imagine how cumbersome it therefore is to do anything...
Would you really enjoy another country constantly dictating every move?

Answer 11

who could imagine then that even the nazis lost fascism actually won both in eastern and western europe. Anyway the economy in western europe could n't be better but in eastern europe economy might have been better