Isn't that true? Look at Iraq before Bush when Saddam was running IRAQ now look at IRAQ's mess Bush is doing? Bush has no solutions and Saddam did!
2006-12-14 08:43:28 · 10 answers · asked by Believe me 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dumbya took a hell and made it hotter.
2006-12-14 10:10:22 · answer #1 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
YOU ARE AN IDIOT... saddam was gasing kurds and training terrorists when he was in powerand bush is doing a great job in iraq... we have not been attacked since 9/11 ( clintons fault) and we are helping the innocent iraqi people that arent terrorists so start asking a good question then i mite actually have to think to answer it ... YOU are an american hating baby killing god hating terrorist loving LIBERAL
2006-12-14 08:48:55 · answer #2 · answered by libshateme 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i imagine that because the preliminary invasion of Iraq the significant element it truly is lengthy gone horribly incorrect is the shortcoming of exact communique between the allied forces and the human beings of Iraq. We were initially welcomed by this manner of excellent type of who were happy to be freed from Hussein's regime yet then we dealt with the aftermath of the warfare and his capture in thoroughly the incorrect way. Understandably there replaced into alot of unrest among the human beings of Iraq, at the same time with each and each and every of the underground communities who reported the invasion as their risk to stamp their dictatortorial mark on the country (some in Hussein's call and some no longer) and those who idea the invasion of their u . s . by all people as thoroughly unlawful. yet particularly of attempting to calm the challenge and are available such as the human beings to stumble on a thanks to barter a way for them to take actual administration of their own u . s . we've persevered, for the most area, on being an unrelenting and uncompromising stress interior of their own cities. I hate to say it even with the undeniable fact that the vanity of our leaders and governments performs a significant area in this; continually pressuming all of us comprehend what's purely right with out relenting any actual quantity of ability for some distance too lengthy to the country we were meant to be liberating.
2016-11-26 19:41:19 · answer #3 · answered by valesquez 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Saddam kept his people oppressed, Bush freed them
2006-12-14 08:49:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you call raping and pillaging a solution. But hey, at least it kept the savages under control. As sick as the man was, I think I have to agree.
2006-12-14 08:46:39 · answer #5 · answered by Randy 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Uh, no he didn't do a great job. He did a horrible job,, Bush is just doing, just as bad a job or slightly better.
2006-12-14 08:45:40 · answer #6 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Your morality and sense of judgement are completely inverted.
2006-12-14 08:46:58 · answer #7 · answered by C = JD 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Turn on your tv and judge.
2006-12-14 08:59:14 · answer #8 · answered by คzzam 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WTF. Saddam killed hundreds of thousands of his fellow country men. Do some research before you post such an irresponsible question.
2006-12-14 08:53:16 · answer #9 · answered by only p 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
DO NOT AGREE!!!!!
2006-12-14 08:48:45 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋