Here is a description of Mummering as described by J. B. Jukes from 1842:
This was the season of general holiday. The lower orders ceased work; and, during Christmas, they amused themselves by what seemed the relics of an old English custom, which, I believe, was imported from the West of England, where it still lingers. Men dressed in all kinds of fantastic disguises, and some in women's clothes, with gaudy colours and painted faces, and generally armed with a bladder full of pebbles tied to a kind of whip, paraded the streets, playing practical jokes on each other and on the passers by, performing rude dances, and soliciting money or grog. They called themselves Fools and Mummers."
2006-12-14 08:23:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tapestry6 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
For years I’ve had disorders with the casually furnished “good, the whole lot occurs for a rationale” excuse. It continuously left a foul style in my mouth, however I wasn’t capable to pin down precisely why this apparently harmless word rubbed me the fallacious approach. Being the meant deep philosopher that I fake to be, I tried to good judgment out the argument for why the whole lot might certainly occur for a rationale. When any person says that they consider that the whole lot has a rationale, it instantly motives a series of motives, and this series have to itself both be brought on or no longer brought on. So if there's a purpose to the series, it have to be external the area of motives, but when it's not brought on, the series have to be quintessential, or its possess purpose. Their argument then is that the universe consists of based elements and that there have to be an external, quintessential being, God, as writer of the arena to have brought on it to occur. Since God assumedly is aware of all, the item have to then were well and it is just our point of view of the item that's misguided. But it is a unhealthy conception and fallacious reasoning. Just on the grounds that something has a purpose does no longer imply that it used to be dependant on an additional or that the well factor couldn’t have come both independently or with out the unhealthy factor taking place. Moreover, it assumes that a God might no longer do unhealthy matters to us for us to study a better well, however that's an additional argument. This took me again to the customary reason of the pronouncing. When individuals say, “the whole lot occurs for a rationale” they look to have 3 methods where they meant their declaration to encounter. The first is that there's a God and that that God controls all minutias within the universe. So the whole lot from the orbit of sun tactics, to a hearth that rips via a nursery, to you stubbing your toe is all facet of a grasp plan by means of an all strong, supernatural being, who controls such a lot of the universe as to purpose your loose will to be nugatory and thereby debunks the desire for a God within the first position. The moment is certainly one of Karmic conception where the there's a stability to the universe and that the well and unhealthy will finally wash. This assumes that there's a usual equilibrium to the whole lot. This, at the same time lovely in its simplicity, is shot aside while staring at the substantial majority of the arena round us. Equilibrium in math or technological know-how is a quantifiable results, however fails while implemented such a lot of existence. You spraining your ankle getting the mail can simplest be Karmicly balanced out if it entails an elaborately fanciful tale. Seeing matters as balanced then turns into a lesson in denial, where the whole lot is balanced simplest on the grounds that you consider it so and fail to rationale. The thirds is used as a studying revel in in that there's continuously whatever well to be taken from some thing that has occurred. But this conception fails in train as the 2 paths from an occasion are not often same or always based. Say that any person misplaced their youngster to Hurricane Katrina. Saying that they then located a deeper dating with their puppy is neither a reasonable transference nor unattainable with out the dying in their youngster. What bothers me approximately “the whole lot occurs for a rationale” is that it cheapens rationale itself. It takes any person who has had whatever that they deem as unhealthy and makes an attempt to gloss over that unhealthy factor with any person else’s failed ideology or an tremendously misguided idea approach. So subsequent time whatever unhealthy occurs, don’t try to attach the universe with the item, simply receive that the unhealthy factor has occurred, paintings to fix the harm within the satisfactory viable approach, and check out to larger revel in while existence is well.
2016-09-03 13:35:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋