Since the population increase correlates with greenhouse gasses increase?

Question

Should we limit the population?

which way do you sway liberals??

Freedom to procreate, or save the world?

Answer 1

Coincidence is NOT correlation.

Note: The total amount of episodes of terrible uber-teen MTV Show "Laguna Beach" have also increased along with Global Warming. Does that make this the cause?

Global warming is caused by one thing alone, nature. Global warming was around and kicking before man ever had anything to pollute with. Is Al Gore's next claim going to be that cave fires polluted the air to cause the first bout of global warming?

Answer 2

Absolutely. Too bad that concept doesn't work well with our current economic "model." Everything is based on faster, cheaper, toss-it-in-the landfill method of production, while certain groups in the population breed like there's no tomorrow. (PS--I'm doing my part for population control by having no kids.)

I love a hot shower, and watching TV in an air-conditioned house. Maintaining this standard of living gets more difficult each year. With power shortages in CA, gas prices high, with real-estate FORCING most people to commute long distances, where will it end??? And population control? What about immigration control? HAHAHHA.

More people means more oil and electric consumption, which is great for the oil industry but not for anyone else. And yeah, we could all live in megatowers and sleep in refrigerator sized cubicles like some people are forced to do in Japan, but I am not trained for that, and couldn't adapt. Maybe I'm slated for burial while the rest of humanity clamors to fit into a matchbox.

Sorry--a long answer for the simple YES. Although I cannot proffer any theory or method for accomplishing this task without starting another war.

PS--"greener technology" and reducing consumption only prolongs the inevitable exponential increase in population which will hence again INCREASE consumption no matter what green tech. you use. It is a no-win situation. Nature (bacteria, fungus, deer, etc.) all have self-regulating systems to control populations. AIDS isn't doing the trick. And look, even hunter-gatherer societies were kept under control with a draught, buffalo shortage, or crop failure.

Answer 3

I've always been in support of limiting the amount of children a couple can have. If each couple had 2.25 babies (one to take place of each parent and .25 to make up for the babies who die or can't reproduce), the population in the world would stay constant.

That wouldn't fly too well with most people who beleive its their god given right to have 12 kids, but someday down the road (unless we have a nuclear holocaust), population control will need to be discussed. Maybe by 2050.

Answer 4

do you recognize, how plenty oil people pump out of the wells on a daily basis? i'll furnish you a style. that's 80 a million barrel each and every day. yet what are we doing with this oil? we are burning approximately 80% of it. this means, we are pumping approximately 35 million lots of carbon dioxide into the air each and every day, and it somewhat is barely from oil, you're able to desire to characteristic coal. think of a sprint approximately it, what happens with this CO2? there are various shown information that greenhouse gases are increasing. There are direct measurements international and there is lots of papers which prepare the mechanisms how greenhouse gases artwork. you're able to desire to study them, to understand approximately it and to have the possibility to take your guy or woman conclusions. as long as you study merely newspapers or different solutions right here, you have merely 2d or third hand tips, and that's by no potential top. analyzing is as much as you. @uk_pinda: i could certainly prefer to observe your source, that asserts that CO2 is close to an all time low........could you please mail it to me?

Answer 5

I think population should be regulated. Only one child per family unless it is twins or something. People are overpopulating this world and we are running out of room. We can't even take care of the people already here. Why should we be allowed to add more?

Answer 6

freedom to procreate and saving the world through greener technology.

Answer 7

WOW! I bet you didn't expect people to think you were serious, did you? Just supports what I've said before. Liberals have NO sense of humor.

Answer 8

Yes we need to control the population. You can start by jumping off a cliff.

Answer 9

No just realize that global warming is not real.

Answer 10

Correlation does not imply causation, moron.