Please go to DeadBeatPoliticians.com and vote for a dead beat [politician
2006-12-14 06:04:06 · 6 answers · asked by G B 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Other - Arts & Humanities
Nudity has been a component of art since the earliest days of cave paintings, and people have reacted to it either positively or negatively throughout history.
If we remember that nudity is simply an unclothed human body, it really is neutral in and of itself...how it is depicted, in what circumstances, and for what reasons will determine the positive or negative aspects of it.
I personally like to be naked as much as possible, whether in public or it private, alone or with others, so my perception of nudity in art is generally positive. Others, of course, will bring their own perceptions to the subject and react individually in accordance with their values.
One thing is certain...nudity will always be a part of artistic expresion, and it will always be somewhat controversial.
2006-12-18 02:46:44 · answer #1 · answered by nudie chick 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The human body is a beautiful thing and there is nothing wrong with admiring it. Think the statue of David.
2006-12-14 09:56:21 · answer #2 · answered by maryanndertal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Taste like chicken !
2006-12-14 06:09:26 · answer #3 · answered by Rusty Jones 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is your definition of tasteful? Heck what's your definition of art?
2006-12-14 06:07:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It shouldn't inspire lust. That's called porn.
2006-12-14 06:53:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
only partially prurient ;-)
2006-12-14 06:07:42 · answer #6 · answered by drakke1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋