2006-12-14 05:41:14 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
WWE is more better because of more wrestlers and longer shows.
2006-12-14 05:48:39 · answer #1 · answered by MAF1113 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The question thats been on almost every wrestling fan's mind....Well personally I think both are good in their own ways. Since wwe has been along for a long time, I like some of the superstars who have accomplished a lot in their career. ex: Undertaker, Shawn Michaels, Triple H, Chris Benoit. Whereas Tna is not as old as the wwe, it has some real good talent. ex: AJ Styles, Christopher Daniels, Sonjay Dutt and most of the X Division. wwe has more money than tna and therefore do a better job in promoting and have 3 different brands which gives the fans a variety. Whereas tna is more of wrestling and less of entertainment than wwe even though its on for an hour. Tna has creative matches and creative moves too.
I think wwe is better money wise, but Tna uses its talent well as compared to wwe who just try to promote big guys.
2006-12-14 16:43:11 · answer #2 · answered by CodeRed 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No WWE is not better than TNA.
TNA has a tag team division
WWE does not
TNA has the X-Division
WWE does the same thing every week.
TNA has good quality matches.
WWE has too many squash matches
This is just a few of the things that proves TNA is better than WWE.
2006-12-14 19:05:53 · answer #3 · answered by Gamergirl 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WWE has got the money,mind due so has TNA and TNA is more entertaining because they have better talent and storylines.Personally i think TNA will rival WWE soon because TNA is more entertaining in a lot of ways.
2006-12-14 14:59:53 · answer #4 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is my opinion.
There are great things about each company. But TNA is more entertaing to me. this is why
TNA has a better tag division, hands down. And the X division on TNA is better than the Cruiserweight division on WWE. The X division is much more entertaning, again...hands down.
WWE has WAY more people that TNA, but the ones TNA has are great. I watch both, infact Raw and Impact are tied as my favorite shows, but TNA by far has better story lines and matches. WWE will show 5 boring matches and one good main event. TNA will show only 4 matches, but all of them will be good, entertaing matches.
WWE will run a storyline in the dirt (OLD). Take DX and NWO. NWO (when it got brought back) was running its good name (from WCW) in the dirt. DX (who is now entertaing...for now) but is starting to get old by doing the same things over, over, over, and over again.
Where both are good. TNA is just more entertaing to me.
Or at least that is my humble opinion.
2006-12-14 14:07:18 · answer #5 · answered by Devin G 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
WWE is better than TNA at the moment
2006-12-14 14:00:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now way....tna is because bescause they have a 6 side ring and also the wrestling in tna is 100% real. and wwe is just an ENTERTAINMENT
2006-12-14 14:48:05 · answer #7 · answered by Bling Bling 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well not really, i say tna is better than tna but doesnt have the smash mouth physical wrestling like smackdown has. so i say 50 50 they both are good. its just raw is horrible. but smackdown is great and tna is great but needs to expand to 2 or 3 hours.
2006-12-14 14:04:37 · answer #8 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE All the Way Batista John Cena Chris Benoit and Undertaker and His brother make it all happen but if all of them retire I would say still WWE
2006-12-14 14:44:27 · answer #9 · answered by Malik 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. The WWE has the better crews, agents, management teams, wrestlers, focus and owners as well as other politics.
Yet "better" does not always mean "the best"!
2006-12-14 14:15:22 · answer #10 · answered by c0171♥ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋