Would you choose a career that is stable, potentially lucrative but boring as all hell. Or would you choose a career that is less stable, not as potentially lucrative, but interesting?
2006-12-14 04:07:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance ➔ Careers & Employment
Definitely stable... actually the ideal for me is an easy, low-stress job that pays well... and you can always pursue other options if you have the cash flow that can keep you on your feet long enough.
2006-12-14 04:13:31 · answer #1 · answered by Lowa 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personal choice. Personally, I don't know why you limit yourself to those two options. There are careers out there that are stable, potentially lucrative, but not boring as hell. I personally would stick to a more stable career path.
2006-12-14 04:11:48 · answer #2 · answered by Commerce Student 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would choose a stable, potentially lucrative but boring as all hell job! Your bills will comem in every month very stable so I choose a job that matches my bills.
2006-12-14 04:10:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At this factor in my existence I consider like I can do each. I have discovered any individual whom I think I will have a loving courting with and now I will have to paintings on a profession. Love is simpler to discover that almost all individuals feel. When you discover it, you simply recognize and you're employed on it. But you'll have each. Although a profession takes a further variety of attempt, it may well turn out to be a double existence that no longer many individuals can manage.
2016-09-03 13:04:06 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We think with our minds, but we live by our hearts.
Your life will seem more fulfilling when you live well. Choosing a job that is personally fulfilling is part of living well. There are plenty of people who make lots of money in boring jobs, and who want to get out or to kill themselves. It's just not rational to do that to yourself (torment yourself for money or prestige by pursuing a job/career that is mind-numbing). That's why teachers teach: something within them compels them to come back every day and teach children in spite of the small paycheck and the sometimes aggravating children (!). It's the satisfaction that they are contributing their knowledge and skills for the betterment of society and humanity (even if it seems like an uphill battle or a lost cause).
2006-12-14 04:14:49 · answer #5 · answered by RolloverResistance 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I enjoy the boring but lucrative work, as I seek my excitement elsewhere other than the 9-5 workday.
2006-12-14 04:10:43 · answer #6 · answered by Munya Says: DUH! 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Depends on your situation, if you don't have a family to take care of, have enough money saved if you ever need it then go with the second one, but if you have someone other then youself you are supporting I'd have to choose the first option.
2006-12-14 04:11:31 · answer #7 · answered by strtat2 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Eh,would you believe...I'd go with the less stable,potentially dangerous,but always entertaining one.
2006-12-14 04:11:39 · answer #8 · answered by Max 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
someone once said
work & Salary in a person's life is divided into 3 stages.
1 stage - less salary, more work
2 stage - More salary, more work
3 stage - less salary, Less work
so, if you think you need experience then do the best choice. But if you think you need more money then do accordingly.
2006-12-14 04:13:31 · answer #9 · answered by pksk212 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋