2006-12-14 03:22:48 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Brownback is a specialty move in the bath house.
2006-12-14 03:25:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Obama's name will ONLY be a liability if Republicans make it out to be. Comparing ANYONE to Saddam Hussein or Osama bin Laden is a SICK thing to do.
I don't really see too much of a problem with Brownback's name. The only Republican's name voters MAY have trouble with is Guiliani, but that would only be for people who didn't have T.V.'s on 9/11.
2006-12-14 11:27:54 · answer #2 · answered by amg503 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Um, Obama is easier for the average American to mispronounce, as Ted Kennedy has demonstrated.
The name Brownback would probably only be noteworthy to some kind of gay-basher, or otherwise childish person.
Name and ethnicity shouldn't be issues. Character, experience and stands on the issues should be.
PS Maybe this is why Kinky Friedman didn't win in Texas. :)
2006-12-14 11:59:15 · answer #3 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel sorry for people pathetic enough to let the name of politicians decide their vote. Personally, however, I'd say Brownback. Obama's just foreign.
2006-12-14 11:26:12 · answer #4 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sure to idiots who judge people by their names...and there are a hell of a lot of them.
2006-12-14 11:25:01 · answer #5 · answered by dstr 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Neither. I look at issues not names.
2006-12-14 11:25:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋