I'm not entirely sure (yet), but notice what happens when you take the difference of each term and its successor:
18, 38, 66, 102, 146, ...
i.e., 7 + (18) = 25, 25 + (38) = 63, 63 + (66) = 129, ...
Now take the difference of each term and its successor in our new sequence:
20, 28, 36, 44, ...
Which looks to be linear; indeed, the formula would be f(n) = 8n + 12.
You might be able to use this to deduce the original sequence; I'm not quite sure of the method for doing this, but I feel it is reasonable to conjecture that the sequence is cubic in nature. If so, you can set up and solve this system of equations:
f(1) = 7 = a + b + c + d,
f(2) = 25 = 8a + 4b + 2c + d,
f(3) = 63 = 27a + 9b + 3c + d,
f(4) = 129 = 64a + 16b + 4c + d.
Good Luck!
2006-12-14 03:16:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bugmän 4
·
0⤊
0⤋