OK, so reading the numerous comments on this website, nearly all of you seem to think that Princess Diana was murdered, despite (a) loads of witnesses, (b) hard evidence, and (c) millions of pounds spent on two separate police enquiries (both of which independantly came to the same conclusion - it was an alcohol-induced accident).
What's the point? Should they have abandoned the enquiries and used the money to catch proper criminals?
PS in case any conspiracy theorist suggests otherwise, the Twin Towers WERE destroyed by terrorists, and the Americans DID land on the Moon.
2006-12-14 01:49:35 · 22 answers · asked by grpr1964 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
We will never know the truth about Diana, would anyone tell us if there was a conspiracy?
There are still many questions not answered.
2006-12-14 03:03:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are so correct! Why can't people just let this woman RIP? She is looked upon as some Goddess. Man, she was just a Woman. Just like all the other beautiful women I will pass on the street,in my car & meet tonught in the bar. For whatever it's worth, this woman was lucky enough to be abused by the next King of England. What a stroke of luck??????? She may not have felt that way after a while?
Money on crime should always be spent in the correct areas. There is no need for waist just for the tabliods. Hey COPS, why don't you find the *** Hole that broke into my House & took all my Ex-Wife;s jewerly? That's where this money should go!
2006-12-14 02:05:49 · answer #2 · answered by Mr Brightsides 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Americans did land on the Moon, however physics would not allow them to take any pictures with the crappy little cameras they had (the film would either melt of crack depending on the heat/cold and other solar radiation would blank any image taken) -
The Police have categorically confirmed the Blood sample was taken from the driver - CONCLUSIVE proof that the blood was his, however as alcohol could be added to a blood sample not conclusive that the guy was drunk.
The Police have said that at the time of Diana's death she was not pregnant - heavy impacts to her stomach, whilst she was alive could easily make that statement true - she could have died after a miscarriage - to be honest I don't really care what happened, as the public is never told the truth by its rulers...
2006-12-14 11:45:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was quite obvious that the decision of the inquiry would be what it was. i think it was a waste of time and money
and i still think the whole thinks stinks
you say "loads of witnesses" ..... then why were there witnesses that have never been interviewed officially
"hard evidence" is the evidence they want us to see
exert from the official inquiry
"The white Fiat Uno remains one of the key mysteries of the investigation. The report says that the French investigation team carried out a major search but could not locate it
It is unlikely that the white Fiat Uno with which Diana's Mercedes collided in the Alma underpass will ever be traced.."
2006-12-14 08:04:19 · answer #4 · answered by ♥gigi♥ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with the majority in thinking that she was murdered and it was probably set up by the royal family.
But I DO think that it is a waste of time and money re-opening the case, because whoever covered up the truth the last time will do it again, the police will come to the same conclusion. And if like I think (that the royal family were involved) then they definately won't let the truth come out.
2006-12-14 01:55:32 · answer #5 · answered by Yasmin H 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, the media were only doing what the media does and broke the regulation doing it, for which they are going to be rightly punished (a minimum of we are hoping they are going to this time). historic previous obviously shows you could't rigidity one set of morals on those which have a special innovations-set, all you ought to do is ensure issues unlawful, which makes it harder for them to indulge their kind of immorality and is why telephone hacking is now unlawful, for sure. it really is unnecessary to target to rigidity a replace in morality on the media, it gained't paintings till you've really censorship which the authorities would fairly, fairly opt to do and could be as a ways from the universal public activity as you ought to get. The obsession with NOTW immorality lessens or maybe hides the most intense factors of this situation; the incompetence and/or corruption in the police and the hideously incestuous courting between politicians and the media. the most intense by using a ways is the enquiry into the police.
2016-10-18 06:57:29 · answer #6 · answered by benner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Despite the press hype, I believe that most people don't actually care what really happened. It's history.
I agree that the time and money would be better spent on current cases, like the Ipswich murders.
2006-12-14 02:01:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you. What's the point of a time and money-consuming enquiry, if it comes up with the same conclusions as the original investigation?
2006-12-14 01:59:24 · answer #8 · answered by feeltherisingbuzz 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I believe it is both a waste of time and money. What happened is history and cannot be changed by however much money is thrown at it. There will always be doubts in peoples minds as to what really happened and other details.
2006-12-14 01:56:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's not important after 10 years. The truth will never be known. Many a story will be made up about it and many a film will hit the big screens.
It's old news and for the sake of her sons people should let it blow over.
2006-12-14 03:03:25 · answer #10 · answered by Tabbyfur aka patchy puss 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋