English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-14 01:41:33 · 28 answers · asked by Dorothy B 1 in Society & Culture Royalty

28 answers

Perhaps entitled, but for most it is either "Here Doggy Doggy" or "Damned, the old mare got loose again."
Charles "That Cheeky Lad"
None the less...A Wicked Happy Christmas to everyone!
Peace and prosperity to all!

2006-12-14 01:47:44 · answer #1 · answered by Charles-CeeJay_UK_ USA/CheekyLad 7 · 0 5

When I saw 14 answers I did not imagine so many of them would be useless or wrong. She is indeed Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Cornwall. In legal fact she is HRH The Princess of Wales - by law the wife of the Prince of Wales is Princess of Wales - and will in law be Queen, but they do not use the title as they know it would enrage imbeciles like some of the people on this page. In fact it was on very specious grounds that George VI and his wife tried to deny the Duchess of Windsor from being called HRH - as a matter of law the Windsors had a stronger case than the King regarding her proper title.

2006-12-14 13:10:49 · answer #2 · answered by Dunrobin 6 · 2 1

Camilla, second wife of the current Prince of Wales, is styled HRH Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall and when in Scotland HRH Duchess of Rothesay

2006-12-14 22:18:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As many have already answers, she is officially HRH THe princess of Wales. They (the establishment) just knows that it wouldn't go over too well if they used that title.

The interesting thing is that when Charles becomes King, she will be - like it or not - according to law - Her Majesty the Queen consort. The Royol Family has indicated that they won't use that title, but no sooner had they made that announcement, when it was announced that she will by the Queen whether they call her that or not.

Once Diana died, Charles was free to re-marry in the church (remember . . . "until death do us part", and his wife (divorced or not) is entitled to all rights, privileges, and titles.

2006-12-16 21:55:16 · answer #4 · answered by David and Malou K 1 · 0 0

yes, she is called HRH The Duchess of Cornwall, when charles is king , she will be HRH Duchess of Lancaster.
Fancy that eh?

2006-12-14 16:48:24 · answer #5 · answered by obanlassie 3 · 0 0

Only if HRH stands for Horses Rear Hiney

2006-12-15 00:28:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes.camilla is entitled HRH since she married Prince Charles since he is HRH.

2006-12-14 23:34:37 · answer #7 · answered by Katt82 2 · 0 0

She is not entitled to bcalled HRH. Since Charles a first time divorcee and she is a first time divorcee, they won't inherite the Crown and the Kingship. Cause the King ? now the Queen is head of the Angelican church of England. They can't be divorced lout church doctrine. So does this clearify the question ?

2006-12-14 09:54:11 · answer #8 · answered by angelikabertrand64 5 · 0 2

Yes, simply because her husband is a member of the royal family and has the title HRH already. Simply by wedding her husband, she became a HRH.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HRH

2006-12-17 21:50:23 · answer #9 · answered by Some Like 1 · 0 0

I don't think she can be called HRH. That title doesn't come automatically. As a duchess, however, she is addressed as "Your Grace," or "Her Grace."

2006-12-14 17:32:20 · answer #10 · answered by white_bunny_slippers 2 · 0 0

Lets face it she was the cause for the marriage to break up, she shouldn't even have a royal title. Maybe we'll get fed up of them and become a republic. Just a minute that would mean we might have Blair as 'King'

2006-12-15 18:37:37 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers