Bush does not speak for the solidiers. There are cemeteries being created to accommodate fallen soldiers all over the country. He is only interested in his self interest not the American people.
2006-12-14 01:31:04 · 8 answers · asked by Sports Maven 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I agree that Bush does not speak for the soldiers when he cannot provide the troops he sent to Iraq witth all of the equipmen they need.
I am not worried about him backtracking too much because there is a potential shift in power in the Senate. Even if the Republican party regains their control (which is far from certain) the Senate won´t deviate too far from what is being planned already. The reason is simple. Iraq has been badly handled and the American people want new action; and these politicians want to get reelected, and some of them are thinking of running in ´08.
2006-12-14 01:46:59 · answer #1 · answered by phoenixbard2004 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, Bush does not get to appoint a Senator to replace the ailing Senator from SD. If he should die, the replacement is decided by the Governor from SD.
Do I trust Bush, not after the first 4 years. My father was Career military having fought in both WWII and Korea and I suspect that he is rolling over in his grave over this waste of life and poorly handled war. Bush's judgments are suspect, his analysis of the situation was and is poor and the replacement of Gardner by Paul Bremmer was unbelievably STUPID. Keeping Rumsfeld was also STUPID. Unfortunately, Bush seems to have only listened to the war hawks and not those who actually understood the situation. The war hawks wanted this war and pushed for it and badgered the CIA to skew their analysis to make the data support the war.
I say all of this and I was a Republican. But, based on the poor decision making by the entire Republican party I could not support them at all in Novembers election. I, and many other Republicans have had enough, even if that means voting for every Democrat and Libertarian I can, whether I truly agree or not, is what I will do because we must drive home the idea that the Republican party no longer is a party we believe in or trust.
2006-12-14 10:05:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never trusted that lying sack of crap to begin with. To many of our brave young men are being returned home in coffins, to be able to trust his stance on the war. Besides didn't he declare mission accomplished over there about 3 years ago?
2006-12-14 09:43:16 · answer #3 · answered by JML 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wish we could impeach Bush and his cohort Cheney, they should be pitched out of office, they are not representing the American people.
The crooks should never gone into Iraq in the first place. This has got to be one of the biggest blunders of the century.
2006-12-14 09:38:49 · answer #4 · answered by lonetraveler 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
How do you know how Bush speaks for the soldiers. Stop using inane blanket statement. You end up looking like the southern end of a north bound horse.
2006-12-14 09:33:46 · answer #5 · answered by zombiefighter1988 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I've never trusted the man.
He's got shifty eyes, tells lies, and surrounds himself with thugs.
.
2006-12-14 09:34:28 · answer #6 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
he does speak for the solidiers and i do trust him
2006-12-14 09:34:50 · answer #7 · answered by jared 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I speak for this soldier, yes i trust him
as for the libs, do i trust them with my taxes? with the military? with national security? hell no
2006-12-14 09:34:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋