It seems unlikely that if an unfamous person built a theme park in their back yard and slept with teenage boys in their beds that we would even be questioning the motives.... your thoughts?
2006-12-14 01:01:17 · 19 answers · asked by Madam Rosmerta 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Michael Jackson disgusts me, he should have been jailed for his crimes, been put on the sex offenders register and had his kids placed in safe, caring homes!
Like you say, any layman would have been prosecuted along time ago.
2006-12-14 01:05:17 · answer #1 · answered by benn26k 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Most unfamous people wouldn't have the money to build a theme park in their back yard! The poor man is just trying to experience the childhood that was stolen from him and to make sure other children get to enjoy theirs but even now when he's a grown man people will not let him have that! He likes children because they don't see him as the superstar Michael Jackson, they just treat him like a normal human being and a guy that they can have water fights with! Michael would never hurt ANY child in ANY way!!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2006-12-14 06:04:37 · answer #2 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I do not know. I know of nobody unfamous who could build a whole theme park in their back yard. There is nobody quite like Michael Jackson, he is unique I give him that. And I am sure his circumstances are unique too. Michael is a child in heart.
When you are famous the lynch mob have the noose ready waiting for you to fall into their hands. Proof is not their interest.
2006-12-14 01:04:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
this question is in accordance to an unknown premise and blind faith. before each and every thing, i do not comprehend if he did or did not, I wasn't there and that i did not comprehend the guy. next, even if I did, you many times listen this stuff take position from human beings they in no way would have suspected. i have heard this in my own existence from an same challenge appropriate to relations. it truly is why the nature of the accuser ability plenty too and to that end the nature of the accuser sounds unfavorable. That makes issues harder yet does no longer recommend it did not take position. very last and maximum significant, you're assuming he's instantly and prefers "youthful girls or women". What if he likes youthful ones. There are ill, ill, those who somewhat like youthful ones. in case you haven't heard of them they have a time period: pedophilia. they don't choose women or women. Heck he will be innocuous and gay for all all of us comprehend and in no way choose women. instantly or gay, regrettably some ill, evil human beings scouse borrow the innocence of youthful ones. we do not comprehend which MJ replaced into in problem-free words he and per chance some on the point of him.
2016-11-26 02:37:37 · answer #4 · answered by chrisholm 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The knee jerk reaction is that he is a paedo. I want to believe otherwise. My thoughts are that he had a screwed up childhood/teens and he tried to re live those years vicariously. Hopefully any way!!!!
2006-12-15 00:03:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is strange by any known human definition of the word. It's his deep misfortune that he happens to like switching out his head every decade, and the last one didn't fully take.
2006-12-14 01:10:09 · answer #6 · answered by martino 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The guy is good hearted and tried to help kids , he was set up for an easy million $ not one time but two.
2006-12-14 02:27:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
He was a great performer, but also a nut case, but also misunderstood I think it goes far deeper than we will ever know
2006-12-14 03:21:29 · answer #8 · answered by ringo711 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well-understood manipulative child groomer.
2006-12-14 01:05:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
He's a Bad, Smooth Criminal who is Dangerous to small children. I would just like to say, though, that Billie Jean is NOT my lover - she's just a girl who claims that I am 'the one.'
.
2006-12-14 01:12:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋