If you were given unlimited funding to help researchers eradicate one of the world's illnesses, which one would you choose? This is a social studies research question to conclude which disease should be in the forefront of research funding, when considering public opinion.
2006-12-13 23:19:29 · 12 answers · asked by Nancy M 2 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
If you choose cancer please go into detail as to which form of cancer.
2006-12-13 23:27:08 · update #1
I can't mention one without mentioning the other:
AIDS
Cancer
2006-12-13 23:24:35 · answer #1 · answered by DJ 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
None of them.
Let's say we solved every disease in the world. Cool, right?
Now you've gotten overpopulation.
Ever heard of Darwin's theory of evolution? "Survival of the Fittest"?
Well, us humans have slowed this thing to a crawl by saving every last person, even the plant people. Now, I'm not saying that's BAD, i think it's moral to help people, but I don't think that a certain cure should just take all priorities over the others.
2006-12-13 23:48:12 · answer #2 · answered by Roka 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stupidity
2006-12-13 23:22:07 · answer #3 · answered by Z 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
In general FLU Epidemics
2006-12-13 23:30:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
AIDS-Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
&
Blood Cancer
2006-12-13 23:27:15 · answer #5 · answered by R2 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
there are so many of them out there to choose from, but I would have to say Heart disease
2006-12-13 23:24:27 · answer #6 · answered by Diana J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Human stupidity
2006-12-13 23:27:37 · answer #7 · answered by mrfoxhorn 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Human stupidity
2006-12-13 23:26:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
cancer
2006-12-13 23:23:44 · answer #9 · answered by laney 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
is stupidity a disease?
2006-12-14 04:03:22 · answer #10 · answered by racer 51 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋