The character of James Bond requires More of Talking and Acts from Eyes and Expressions , rather than , wholly through Body. The Present Bond has extraordinary body to do Stunts and may be a good Kisser but lacks the Sensousness and Soothingness of the Original Bond Guy/s. I feel nobody can replace BROSNAN.
2006-12-14 22:06:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a great movie and a great actor, but just doesnt fit into my perception of James Bond. I dont mind what the author and inventor of 007 initially had on his mind, I liked the hollywood adaptation.
I want Brosnan back. It is always the same. The older the film the better they get!
2006-12-14 07:03:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gorilla 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No he is the second blond bond and that makes him a bit odd from the others.
2006-12-14 07:06:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mr X 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nah, i don't like the movie and the bond, it was not that good compared to otheres.
2006-12-15 02:17:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by tammy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No he is the second blond bond
2006-12-14 23:27:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by arpita 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no but i like him because he has a style of his own...he's bought new things to the new movie...
and Angelina says he is a great kisser, so that's a BIG advantage!
⥠M~e~r~r~y X~m~a~s â¥
2006-12-14 06:58:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Somebody said he is not handsome like others but i thinh he is ok
2006-12-14 07:03:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by monicaboo15 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
HE IS A UGLIEST BOND EVER
2006-12-14 06:59:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by mr. x 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
HE IS A UGLIEST BOND EVER.
2006-12-14 06:57:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by pawar manisah g 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
evrybdoy likes it
2006-12-14 07:01:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ahmad Helmi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋