he shouldn't charge you. they are required to paint inbetween tenants. of course most of the time they don't. thin out some paint so the color blends a little better if you are going to try to paint over it. just mix a little paint with water.
2006-12-13 18:31:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If the scratches are indeed "small" then maybe your landlord will let it slide. If not then pay for it. Would you rather your landlord came on yahoo to ask how he could make some big scratches on the wall so that he could take your money instead? How do you expect the guy to deal with you honestly when you are looking to deceive him?
2006-12-13 18:01:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can buy small amounts of patch and paint. since I was the "landlord" at one time I would appreciate it if you took care of something like this, otherwise I'd have a big job and, it isn't fair. Leave it the way you found it.
2006-12-13 22:37:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by cowboydoc 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
if its just paint peeling...
just buy a small can of paint (cost: $10-$15) and paint over the scratch areas.
2006-12-13 18:06:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Babumoshai 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
definitely. Even scuff marks at the instant are not seen regular placed on and tear, and the wear you're describing is merely that; harm. Withold the deposit and could charge for something. If the tenants fail to pay up, sue in small claims. with any luck you have photographs of the wear. @"flusterated:" you're able to desire to understand that the guidance you published isn't stressful-and-quickly CA regulation; that's a instruction manual written by employing attorneys, telling tenants what they like to take heed to. i will assure that if this have been to flow to court docket and the decide replaced into shown "in the previous" and "after" photographs, showing the quantity of harm the tenants created, the owner will win palms-down, even in any such tenant-friendly state. this custom defined on your instruction manual is merely to deter landlord from immediately charging tenants for upkeep that are seen the owner's fee of doing agency. What this poster has defined is out-and-out harm, and paints particularly a disgusting photograph. while the airborne dirt and dust shows in the process the paint, by using fact the poster describes, no decide is going to coach sympathy to a tenant who has so for sure and maliciously destroyed the owner's assets. no longer merely that, yet your guidance does flow directly to declare that copious quantities of harm do justify witholding the deposit, as long by using fact the paint replaced into no longer undesirable adequate to have already mandatory repainting in the previous the tenant moved in.
2016-12-30 09:34:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by santolucito 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Paint from wall to wall.
2006-12-13 23:29:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by bricyns 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get some silicone to seal (depending on how deep) and then paint to match.
2006-12-13 23:14:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by lm6000mech 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
just put a bit of paint over it
2006-12-13 18:07:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by ThebestTom 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Use a stick deodorant bar. when it dries it is hard and won't peel off.
2006-12-13 19:40:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Overrated 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
MINOR DAMAGE SUCH AS SCRATHCES, ARE NORMEL WEAR AND TEAR. THEY CANT CHARGE YOU FOR THEM. NOW IT YOU PUT LOTS OFHOLES IN THE WALLS,TORE UP THE CARPET,ECT... THEN THEY CAN CHARGE YOU.
2006-12-14 11:32:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋