2006-12-13 16:58:03 · 19 answers · asked by ? 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I'd never equate the two.
Simply pointing out how some in America do. Furthermore, many don't see Mahmoud for the threat he is.
2006-12-13 17:06:54 · update #1
I should add that I'm happy many of you took offense at my question: it means you value our great nation and her security.
2006-12-13 17:09:26 · update #2
Ahmadinejad is far worse and can be compared to Hitler in his call for the destruction of the Jews.
2006-12-13 17:06:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Any Government leader who has a conference discussing and denying the fact that the holocaust didnt happen In W.W.2 just to insult the Jews in Isreal is a dangerous man. This iranian President is a Dangerous and sick man and the sooner he is taken out of the Picture the better for all of us. He is a threat to us all in the West . I would not be supprised some day to see Isreal nuke Iran over this. He is a major threat to them especially now that he is trying to develop Weapons grade Plutonium. They may take him out before he trys to take them out first. Then you will have W.W.3
2006-12-14 01:09:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ahmadinejad is a nobody with a big mouth. I likes to boast. That's all.
Righ now, Bush is perhaps the most dangerous power-figure in the world.
2006-12-14 01:14:32 · answer #3 · answered by szhob 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ahmadinejad. Because he is cultivating Arabs in the region and others for that matter to hate on America and exterminate Israel
The Tehran conference is an awful example of this. Even his own people see him as a dictator, a forceful one, that will block secular and liberal institutions to flourish other than religious theocracies
2006-12-14 01:04:55 · answer #4 · answered by TruthSeeker 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
amadinejad... but for the most part, he's only a figurehead with no military power, since Iran's president doesn't control it's army...
but he still is a cheerleader for some dangerous people and words can be dangerous....
Bush has much more capability to actually do something, but there is a system of checks and balances for the most part that would restrain any president...
and I think he's more incompetent than dangerous... there is a huge difference there...
2006-12-14 01:08:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
More dangerous is Ahmadinejad. He keeps saying that he wants to get rid of all Jewish people and make Islam the religion that everyone believes.
2006-12-14 01:25:45 · answer #6 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The President of the United States, no matter who's in office, is the most dangerous man in the world. Who's scariest depends entirely on who and where you are, and what you're up to.
2006-12-14 01:03:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ahmadinejad is a menace to civilization.
Bush is standing up to him.
What's dangerous are people equating the 2.
2006-12-14 01:02:28 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It depends on which part of the world you live in. From here, Ahmadinejad is more dangerous.
2006-12-14 01:00:38 · answer #9 · answered by txwebber 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Neither-Ayatollah
2006-12-14 01:05:42 · answer #10 · answered by ? 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋