English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Stalin was a horrible guy, but many historians seem to argue that Stalin did it in cause for the Revolution. I think that's BS, but I'd like some hard evidence and opinions of other people to know if Stalin actually betrayed or fulfill the boundaries of the revolution.

Thanks.

2006-12-13 15:19:58 · 6 answers · asked by K K 2 in Arts & Humanities History

6 answers

He betrayed it. He ordered to kill most of the relovution leaders that were still alive. Pretty much, everyone of any significance who Stalin could get his hands on were blamed on some very strange charges and executed. Moreover, he executed most of the commanding officers of the Red Army, just in case if somebody decided to do another revolution. He lived in constant fear; once he started doing bad things he simply couldn't afford to stop. (Partly because the army was left without experienced combat officers, Russia wasn't doing so well at the beginning of WWII, but that's another story.)

It is a different question if revolution itself was a good or bad thing for Russia. But what Stalin did - killing all the relovotion leaders - is certainly not fullfilling Lenin's wishes.

2006-12-13 15:23:02 · answer #1 · answered by Snowflake 7 · 4 0

it truly is an impressive challenge count number decision for one paragraph. The proletarians loved Lenin, they feared Stalin. the point of the revolution replaced into to take the flexibility some distance flung from the capitalists and furnish it to the operating type. It replaced good right into a foul idea. the human beings had little or no freedom to pursue their own targets and there replaced into little or no incentive to go back lower back up with new techniques. they did no longer get what they wanted. they in problem-free words were given a particular set of persons telling then what they had to do.

2016-11-26 02:05:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Stalin may have started out with some high ideal about the revolution, but he became drunk and corrupted with power. By WW2, Stalin was all about Stalin. He was one of the worst human beings in history.

2006-12-13 15:27:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He fulfilled but the revolution itself wasn't a good thing in my opinion

2006-12-13 15:22:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He tried to follow Lenin's steps at the beggining but eventually his system changed into a bloody tyranny that as you know lasted maaany years. he was a bastard.

2006-12-13 15:31:34 · answer #5 · answered by Abbey Road 6 · 0 1

Guess we won't know coz he killed everyone who said yes.

2006-12-14 03:35:39 · answer #6 · answered by SHIH TZU SAYS 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers