English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

flame to burn off any stink that they may emit if they are unable to hold a fart?

2006-12-13 15:17:49 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Royalty

10 answers

My mother told me that every so often (but its very rare) a baby is born whose face is covered with a fine intricate black "lace" type garment which is wonderous to behold. Obviously, if it does exist, its biological "lace"... not real lace.

Anyway she told me that for many centuries to the old old past, to to present day, the Royal Family has believed this lace to be a source of power, and have agreements to source these laces, sometimes paying very high prices,... and that no high member of the Royal Family goes out without having an aide be in possesion in one of these laces.

2006-12-13 15:54:21 · answer #1 · answered by Narky 5 · 0 0

Oh ho ho... i will see the commonly used argument coming up right here on no count if the British Royal kinfolk actual has a surname. that's Windsor. An Order in Council of 1960 states that Mountbatten-Windsor is the surname of any royal descendents who do not carry the form of HRH and Prince or Princess. The Queen's babies, besides the undeniable fact that, have puzzled the undertaking with the help of utilising Mountbatten-Windsor on their marriage certificates. that's precisely incorrect besides the undeniable fact that that's in all probability out of understand for their father, who has reported "i'm not something yet an amoeba. i'm the only guy interior the rustic not allowed to pass his call directly to his babies." Japan's royal kinfolk would not seem to have one, yet then that's the oldest non-end royal kinfolk interior the international and not having a surname has continually been classic. The British one in uncomplicated terms has a surname because of the fact the Royal Proclamation of 1917, changing the call of the Royal abode to Windsor, enormously created the Windsor surname - in the previous then there wasn't one. plenty the comparable applies to all the others. there's a Royal abode call, yet in maximum circumstances that's not a surname, and the regulation of the rustic would not require them to apply one. evaluate how surnames developed. They got here approximately in medieval circumstances as nicknames to tell human beings aside who've the comparable call. Royals have by no skill necessary to differentiate themselves in this manner and did not undertake surnames. Iceland nevertheless would not have them for everybody! Icelanders use patronymics - their father's call with -son further for a boy or -dottir for a woman. subsequently the youngster's final names would be different from their mothers and fathers and all of us is listed with the help of first call interior the telephone e book. Denmark grew to become into the comparable till incredibly those days, it is why just about all of us there has one in all a small selection of surnames ending in -sen. basically for example that surnames at the instant are not conventional.

2016-10-14 22:02:39 · answer #2 · answered by didden 4 · 0 0

No - that is so last century - these days they have tubes up their @sses that gather any emissions they may make - i'm told you can buy the bags of gas on the internet - but i'm not into farts even if they are royal!

2006-12-13 15:36:41 · answer #3 · answered by libbyft 5 · 1 1

The Royal Family are so full of crap that the castle could blow up if they didn't.

2006-12-13 15:21:02 · answer #4 · answered by micky 2 · 0 1

i dont know but i would love to see one of the queens lit farts, my boyfriend lights his all the time and its quite entertaining...

2006-12-13 16:00:15 · answer #5 · answered by stacycobine 2 · 0 0

yes it is really true,cant cloud the royal Family you know

2006-12-13 15:21:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

LMAO. Oh, dang, I just farted and didn't have a light...

2006-12-14 01:29:28 · answer #7 · answered by jcboyle 5 · 0 0

That wouldn't surprise me.
What a bizarre family they are.

2006-12-13 15:41:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No.

We are not amused.

2006-12-13 17:40:29 · answer #9 · answered by *Happy Once Again!* 3 · 0 0

lmao!! I hardly think so!

2006-12-13 16:38:04 · answer #10 · answered by •♦๑•TxRose•♦๑• 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers