English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Neogenics is for increasing the number of good minds and reducing crimes, corruption, cruelty etc., for social transformation. Hitherto attempts to transform the society through admonitions and punishments have not yielded any perceptible and lasting results. Genetic transformation of the society will assure lasting peace and harmony.
Racial mingling through neogenics will put an end to violence on racial grounds.
By reducing the incidence of genetically transferable diseases (most of the diseases have a genetic base), drastic improvement in health and reduction in medical expenditure is possible.
Tribal welfare and upliftment. Attempts for the upliftment of the tribal people failed in many countries and a genetic course is the best method towards this goal.
Raising the IQ level of the average population according to the needs of a civilized and technologically advanced society. The benefits of ascending IQ in a population are rather beyond our imagination.

2006-12-13 14:22:24 · 4 answers · asked by anne j 2 in Social Science Sociology

4 answers

Because unlike the development of technology and systems, unlike the breeding of plants and animals this effects directly -
US. If something goes wrong with the development of a technology or breeding program, we may dispense with such.
However if something goes wrong with human genetics, we can't. Look how we have bred the dog over thousands of years. It is good for us but bad for the dog. When you consider what dogs were 20,000 years ago you will find they have been bastardised.
We don't want that to happen to us. Also we know so little about the overall humanity and evolution of such. Lets just get sure before we do something we might regret. Something that cannot be undone. After all evolution has done such a fine job, if it ain't broke-don't fix it. Especially when tampering with it might have such horrible consequences. For those in favour of genetic research, and there is a lot of good potential in it, do two things.
One, the people who propose it , experiment on YOUSELVES
Two, wait a little till more is known, for safety's sake. Continue the research but show respect for the real concerns of people.Then you will get much more support.

2006-12-13 14:32:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

You're very adept at double talk and bullshit, but its obvious you don't know a thing a bout genetics. It has been scientifically prov-en, beyond the shadow of any doubt, that every human being on the planet today, black, white, red or yellow, can be traced back to a single mother living about 150,000 years ago. WE'RE ALL RELATED!! Tribal upliftment? Who says they want to be anything more than they are? And just who is it that makes the determination of who needs "uplifting" and who doesn't? You? God, I hope not.

2016-03-29 06:32:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ask Schwarzenegger he sits on a panel that has history that supported racist eugenics research.

2006-12-13 20:49:19 · answer #3 · answered by UCRPanaman 2 · 0 0

mmmm, could be hitler.

(If one wanted a better answer than this, one would have had to contact me.)

2006-12-13 17:10:32 · answer #4 · answered by sincere12_26 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers