ok, if women were born with enough money to supply themselves an thier children for the span of there lifetime, would women prefer to be artificialy impregnated an raise there kids . or would more women prefer to live with a man ?
2006-12-13 12:52:40 · 8 answers · asked by peeps you 4 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
All the money in the world can't give you a hug. And babies need a father figure. There are alot of women who are strong and are making it on their own and I applaud them for that...there are just as many women who are in families who dedicate their life to children, Neither are wrong. My feelings are truthfully, I would feel sick if the world were empty of male companionship
2006-12-13 12:59:03 · answer #1 · answered by e_piphany214 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
question 1. love is an emotion that comes and goes. the first few years i think most people are together for love.
question 2. most women i know like to have men around their houses.
2006-12-13 20:56:38 · answer #2 · answered by thom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think more would still live with a man because so many just do not want to be alone. They try to fill that emotional hole with a person when only God can really fill it.
2006-12-13 20:58:31 · answer #3 · answered by tam4givin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I percent..of women are in Love.Hey when they figure out Love don't pay the bills they fall out real QUICK (ha-ha)
2006-12-13 21:07:11 · answer #4 · answered by gblue52 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im going to say, for love, rather than have a kid with no father.... sometimes, if love is possible its just better
2006-12-13 20:56:51 · answer #5 · answered by babyatgradys 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's a hard one, I guess 50 %
2006-12-13 20:54:17 · answer #6 · answered by pay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably 50/50.
2006-12-13 20:55:03 · answer #7 · answered by tcbtoday123 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's nice to have company.
2006-12-13 21:23:06 · answer #8 · answered by Jennifer D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋