What if... (slightly different theory about Iraq War)...?

Question

As you guys all know our government went to war with Iraq and told the U.S. citizens that it was because Saddam possessed WMDs. What I'm starting to notice, though, is that perhaps this is all just a ploy to try to get rid of Islam (or at least Muslim Fanaticism).
I was reading "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins (voted #1 intellectual in England by 'Prospect' Magazine) and even his straight-forward rationale was condemning the culture of Islam. Don't get me wrong, Dawkins also spends time in the book taking shots at Christianity but his tone turned almost prophetic when dealing with Muslims.
What (some) people are starting to notice is that perhaps Islam and the Western idea of reasoning and truth (as well as tolerance) are not quite compatible together.
So my question is... do you think it's possible that the U.S. government went to war with Iraq to setup a battlefield on their turf for western culture and Islam to finally spark the *inevitable* showdown?

Answer 1

ofcourse their needs to be a showdown. nonetheless. the cia said saddam had weapons, the fbu said saddam had weapons. bill clinton said he had weapons( just unwilling to do anything about it), al gore said it, kerry said it, british intel said it, russian intel said it, the united nations said it...and if u dont beleive any of those---well Saddam said it. he had 17 months to get rid of it, but even if the whole world was wrong and saddam was lying --so what? he would have at some point, and the terrorist (islamo fascists) must be killed at some point...so...lets get it on.

Answer 2

what a deep thought process to come up with that conclusion but I can't help but think there must be some truth in it. It's scary because this would set up the environment for the end of the world and while i usually don't concern myself with these things, it seems like there has been a lot going on under our noses. The worst thing is that if they can do in this right in front of us and we don't get the hint imagine what they could do without telling the public. Liek the church says (and i do disagree a little bit there is truth to it): The most u can do and the least u can do it pray. Peace!

Answer 3

For the documents: The US govt DID NOT plan the assaults, HOWEVER the US govt DID little or NOTHING to pursue the terrorists that have been already instructed in which within the US "flying faculties" through the Philippine intelligence and others. The govt had skills of terrorists within the US, they knew a essential assault was once coming, there may be NO WAY govt misses such intelligence briefings. Gang contributors participate in larger intelligence offerings than the CIA or the FBI did if the federal government is telling us they knew not anything approximately terrorists within the US. The tricky side: Though the federal government knew approximately terrorists within the US, they feared that they are going to be accused of racial profiling, in view that they knew all of the suspects might be Middle Easterners. So, the federal government allow countless numbers die to deal with the character rights for terrorists.

Answer 4

no because Iraq was ruled by the Baath party a secular party, the Muslim fanatics have been let in by the USA. Under Saddam they would have been hung without trial

Answer 5

No- this would be crazy. The Russians, India, Pakistan, Afganistan, Saudi Arabia to name a few would probably have a problem with us fighting that large of a war in the middle east. It would be the start of one HUGE war.

Answer 6

That implies they were actually planning anything except attacking Iraq then letting whatever happens happen. Which they probably thought was easy victory. Very optimistic.

Answer 7

Absolutely.
They had to start somewhere.

Answer 8

no.