The decider can't decide what to do abouut Iraq.
2006-12-13 10:14:53 · 7 answers · asked by mstrywmn 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
He can't decide because Karl Rove hasn't told him what to do yet.
2006-12-13 14:49:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh, I think he can. The decider decided when he got into this mess what he would do and he is not about to change his mind. Would be too rough on his ego.
2006-12-13 18:17:17 · answer #2 · answered by beez 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
NOW YOU ARE DOWNING THE DECIDER FOR MAYBE CHANGING STRATEGY. I WONDER HOW MANY GREAT LEADERS OF THE PAST CHOSE ONE COURSE OF ACTION AND WHEN IT DIDN'T WORK HE PACKED HIS BAGS AND WENT HOME. WOULDN'T WANT GENERALS IN CHARGE THAT THOUGHT THAT WAY. A RECIPE FOR FAILURE IF I EVER HEARD ONE. IF YOU HAVE BEEN CLOSELY WATCHING, TACTICS AND STRATEGIES HAVE BEEN CONSTANTLY EVOLVING DURING THIS ENTIRE TIME. SOME WORKED WELL, SOME DIDN'T. THERE ARE NO SURE THINGS IN WAR.
2006-12-13 18:23:36 · answer #3 · answered by Rich S 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If there is no decider ,then how can the decider decide ??Decide if you can decide to let us in on the decider decision ,before he decides.
2006-12-13 18:21:18 · answer #4 · answered by pretzgolf 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ooooh, clever.
No, not really.
Was there a question here?
2006-12-13 18:40:59 · answer #5 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah well...neither can the rest of the world, so he's not alone...
2006-12-13 18:18:26 · answer #6 · answered by gokart121 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
OH, you, you, you, you're good, you're good! You are really good!
2006-12-13 18:50:39 · answer #7 · answered by taxidriver 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋