Nope. our government had nothing to do with 9/11
spammer
This guy has several personalities/id's on Yahoo! Answers. To spam his myspace account (which has already been reported to them) Report him to Yahoo! for Abuse. He always uses the urls of known conspiracy/kook sites as his nickname here:
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.prisonplanet.com
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.loosechange911.com
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.infowars.com
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.st911.org
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: 911blogger.com
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: ght657365ijytejk
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: 911sharethetruth.com
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.letsroll911.org
Yahoo! Answers Nickname: www.jonesreport.com
Please, to get the real truth, visit these websites, where they have 1000's of facts and EVIDENCE that 9/11 was carried out by an extremist muslim group. All the links below are to CREDIBLE websites, experts, engineers, fire fighters, controlled demolitionists, and the like, who are more than qualified, and have investigated the events of 911.
And thermite is an INCIDIARY device. Its can't cut through steel the way they are shown in your video (latterally). EVER heard of plasma torches...The kind that were used by the RESCUERS to cut through steel to GET TO PEOPLE that were burried under the debris!?
Debunking Sites:
http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/
http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/4199607.html
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158816635X/sr=8-1/qid=1155609077/ref=sr_1_1/104-6098036-7150331?ie=UTF8
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/19/032851.php
http://www.slate.com/id/1008297/
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.jod911.com/
http://southerncrossreview.org/41/9-11.htm
http://www.lists.opn.org/pipermail/org.opn.lists.skeptix/Week-of-Mon-20060911/003261.html
http://www.politicalhobbyist.com/debunked/alexjones.html
http://www.lolinfowars.co.nr/
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm
http://gradeonegadfly.blogspot.com/2006/10/loose-change-on-upper-east-side-part-i.html
http://www.911cultwatch.org.uk/
http://www.infoshop.org/texts/debunking911.html
http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5782277
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPhysics.HTM
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
http://antitruther.blogspot.com/
http://thedoc911.blogspot.com/
http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2006/09/01/news/conspiracy.php
Reports:
http://wtc.nist.gov/
http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtcreport.htm
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/
http://www.9-11commission.gov/
http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtc-report/WTC_ch2.pdf
http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/09/12/victim-capsule-flight77.htm
http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/article.cfm?archiveDate=10-07-01&storyID=7299
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110285.PDF
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
http://www.asce.org/responds/
http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf
http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~astaneh/1-Services/Astaneh-Testimony%20Congress-March%206%20Final.pdf
http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/defense/aviationnow_jumpstart.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3919613.stm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/02/25/attack/main501989.shtml
http://www.designnews.com/index.asp?layout=article&articleid=CA6363426&industryid=43653
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc04.pdf
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc08.pdf
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2001/embryriddle092101.html
http://www.epa.gov/WTC/demolish_deconstruct/30wbroadway.htm
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp
http://www.firehouse.com/news/2002/7/7_P911.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/11_APdc.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/norman.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/boyle.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28318-2005Apr5.html
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011220shanksville1220p2.asp
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925sledzik0925p3.asp
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011028flt93mainstoryp7.asp
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,212800,00.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34211,00.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/interview.html
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/index.htm
http://cryptome.sabotage.org/wtc-house.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Banaciski_Richard.txt
http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A13766-2001Sep11
http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/030127.asp
http://www.navytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-467181.php
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html
http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/story1a012802.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040225213523/http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usflight232380680sep23.story
http://www.metallurgy.nist.gov/techactv2005/ar2005_safety.html#fire
http://www.911myths.com/html/ntsb_release_august_22_2006.html
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/jan-june02/towers_5-1.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/11/02/wtc.remains.reut/index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20031026101720/http://www.arabianews.org/english/article.cfm?qid=12&sid=6
http://www.september11news.com/OsamaEvidence.htm
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/skyscrapers.pdf
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A19549-2001Sep24
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/M.A.Sweeney.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0%2C1300%2C550486%2C00.html
http://criticalthrash.com/terror.html
http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/11/28/60II/main319383.shtml
2006-12-13 09:53:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by arus.geo 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
exciting questions. for 5 years, I had finished no examine on 9/11 - there are issues on the subject of the conspiracy concept i don't belive such because of the fact the lacking airplane concept, yet there is one very stressful question that maintains to be. If the homes have been introduced down with the help of controlled demolition, it is the case - no question because of the evidentiary squibs + 2 2d era explosions for each twin tower, with a plethora of witnesses and photograph prognosis, then the question maintains to be... who did it. Who grew to become into shriveled because of the fact the demolition team, and why plenty paintings in 3 important homes went undetected. Therein lies the answer to all. ought to be extremely clever terrorists, coverage fraud with the help of the leaseowner, negligence on the area of the government or with the help of the government. needs to be investigated - i'm so suprised the secure practices tapes (which will desire to be docked with the help of skill of internet) of the WTC days ahead of 9/11 at serious development ingredient foundations at the instant are not retrievable. i think securacom, timber brothers enterprise who labored to safeguard the towers, needless to say had a defective secure practices equipment!
2016-10-14 21:28:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can i just say that although i don`t know you, by this statement you seem to be an idiot. George w may not be the brighest bulb in the box but he`s a lot more trustworthy than all these muslims. Conspiracy theories are just excuses and not good ones either. You can make a conspiracy theory for everything you want. For instance do you know that the crises in Darfur is not real-they are just trying to steal money (by the way i`m being sarcastic.) Your argument is flawed and not to well thought out and i suggest you consider what your doing and clean up all the empty beer cans before you post another question like this
2006-12-13 09:38:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by bwfc 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes I did. A faction in the U.S. Government was but one conspirator.
After coming out of shock in about 3 days after the 9/11 attacks, I knew. Everything about the event and coverage appeared to be contrived.
ALL of the evidence points to only one thing...an inside job.
For instance, nothing attacked Building 7. 2 blocks away from the fallen twin towers, it imploded and collapsed just as pin perfectly...straight down. Faster than a falling bowling ball.
And, the lease holder, Larry Silverstein, was video taped saying that he told the FDNY that the smartest thing to do was to "pull it." Devices had to be set in advance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7he_sAVs0A&NR
He insured the WTC 6 weeks before the attack for 8 billion dollars. A clause was added to the policy to provide for terrorist attack, which had never before been done.
There is a multitude of evidence.
BTW: It was Thermate, thermite with sulfur added, that was used to cut the columns.
Wake up people. Please. If you love the United States of America.
Merry Christmas
2006-12-13 09:57:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by interimnotes 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't be suprised Bush wanted the oil. But what leads me to believe that he didn't and just used a bad situation to his advantage is if he planned it. He would have used some one from Iraq. That is where he wanted to go. The Saudi's was his friends. I still don't get the connection of Saudi's blowing up the world trade center and going to war with Iraq. Feels like that is kind of a stretch.
2006-12-13 09:32:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ruth 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I do not understand. How could you say something like that. I am so tired of people blaming each other and hating each other. We know who was responsible for those attacks. If Bush was behind it, don't you think he would have done it a while ago. Why now? I do not believe for one second that the Gov't was behind it.
2006-12-13 09:31:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lauryn B 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Oh not YOU again. One more and I'll report you for spamming.
Just one thing. A house near us suffered an arson attack quite recently. Petrol (gasoline to you) was used as the accelerant. Fire brigade sources said that the fire reached temperatures of well in excess of 1000 degress C. How much of a hole does that blow in your silly "still air temperature of kerosene" theory? It wasn't kerosene burning, it was the building, moron.
2006-12-13 09:30:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Did you know that the 9/11 attacks were NOT carried out by the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT?
Moron.
2006-12-13 09:54:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
uh buddy this is the christmas section, unless bush is trying to steal christmas (actually that seems more like a cheney job lol) this aint the place for terror theories.
2006-12-13 10:07:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can download and post all the lying muslim garbage you want, but it doesn't make it anything but lying muslim garbage. The 9/11 attacks were carried out by muslim men doing exactly what the quran tells every muslim to do. Now grow the hell up and get a real life!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-12-13 09:30:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by judy_r8 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
You have got to be out of your mind or just plain Stupid to believe that statement and I would get it off here If I were you. Your last statement is most true, Don't Listen To This Moron. This is just plain disgraceful. Outrageously DUMB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
2006-12-13 09:33:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by ruth4526 7
·
1⤊
1⤋