Or is he still injured - not being played?
2006-12-13 09:25:12 · 9 answers · asked by big pup in a small bath 4 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
no he was still a bit injured, Hilario was on Goal , and Hedman was the substitute goalkeeper. i like Hilario a lot, i believe in him.
2006-12-13 09:28:46 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Havent seen the beginning line united statesbut whilst torres starts off i'm incredibly particular he will crack a protection that conceded 4 contained in the 1st a million/2 against wigan... sorry to ascertain united followers being desperate might incredibly them than citeh triumphing the identify---- edit--- torres is beginning and danny sturridge aims from the two one among them
2016-10-05 06:52:18 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kasper the only reason u like Hilario is becuz He's Portuguese
Hilario will be starting
2006-12-13 09:41:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man. U. fan answering - SUE ME CLOWNS!!! ;)
nope hilarious kept goal....czek still injured too .....but to hell with chelsea....
i was praying for newcastle to hang on for 0-0....damn chelsea have cut our lead to 5 pts. :(
2006-12-13 14:45:27 · answer #4 · answered by r€dЀυiŁ 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, he didn't... I think Mourinho decided to play Hillario in order to help Cudiccini get to his best form in terms of coming back from injury.
Tchao!
2006-12-13 18:19:10 · answer #5 · answered by Invasion 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Hilarious played but he didn't have chocolate hands like he did against Arsenal.
2006-12-13 09:33:14 · answer #6 · answered by Puma 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hilario played and got himself a CS!!!!
2006-12-13 12:54:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What does it matter the best keeper was on the pitch - his name is Shay Given!!
2006-12-13 09:32:52 · answer #8 · answered by toon_tigger 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
no but from what i heard they really didn't need a top goalie any how,
2006-12-13 09:31:56 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋