concentration camp victims, and animals trapped and experimented on in the animal equivalent of concentration camps?
2006-12-13 09:00:50 · 7 answers · asked by catweazle 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Yes. Animals aren't people and there can be genuine good from experiments on animals whereas experiments on concentration camp victims were incidental to their being in the camp for the Nazi's final solution.
2006-12-13 09:59:21 · answer #1 · answered by Vadalia 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No real science took place in the concentration camps. The Nazis were shite at science, because of their flawed ideology.
So the question is irrelevant really. But real, valid and valuable knowledge is gleaned from animal research. I would not be alive were it not for drugs developed in part by testing on animals. Am I therefore immoral??
2006-12-13 09:16:44 · answer #2 · answered by Avondrow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is there any moral difference between eating chicken and eating babies?
Depends on your morals. For me- yes, quite a bit of difference.
but- I'm a vegetarian.
2006-12-13 09:03:24 · answer #3 · answered by Morey000 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes. you are comparing animals to humans. i for one believe that the life of a human is worth more than the life of an animal. so yes, i believe they are different.
2006-12-13 09:05:00 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. O 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most people would say yes theres a difference.
2006-12-13 09:09:30 · answer #5 · answered by sarah c 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2006-12-13 09:14:30 · answer #6 · answered by acid0philus 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
testing 123...
2006-12-13 09:04:08 · answer #7 · answered by crunchymonkey 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋