questionnaires are used to gather information about peoples opinions about something. So advantages would be, that you are able to see if there is a place for your product, if people want your product. It would also help you understand what someone would want from the sort of product you would be marketing, so features could be developed based on the answers to these questions. Its also good for advertising because a questionnaire can determine the demographic that a product should be aimed at so the advertisers will know what sort of ad campaign would work best to get the main target interested in the thing you wish to sell.
I am sure there are a lot more but that's a start.
2006-12-13 07:51:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cinders 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends what type you are thinking of and what sampling method you are using. Assuming simple random for all of them, if it is postal, it is quick and relatively easy and cheap to get out. However, it has a low response rate. Telephone questionnaires are more expensive and take longer, but have higher response rates. Same with face to face questionnaires but they take forever unless you have loads of money to throw at them.
For all of them, assuming you do closed questions, it is quite easy to analyse and (again assuming you have sampled well and have a good number of responses) will be representative of the population you are looking at.
2006-12-13 07:43:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by xaulleo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can provide questionnaires to a number of people and cover more people than you could doing face to face interviews.
You can standardise the questions so that everybody is asked the same thing.
However, if your wording is at a high reading level then you could find it is completed by only a subsection of those who receive it.
You can provide tick boxes and choices to ensure people provide answers that are easier to graph/chart.
2006-12-13 07:42:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It somewhat annoys me that it greater into that when you consider which you're able to be a Zionist and not additionally be Jewish and you'd be anti Zionist and be Jewish. Its 2 distinctive issues Zionism is somebody agreeing with the desire for a Jewish native land, some religious jews do no longer even consider that. So yea in my opinion one would not flow with the different, yet some people are the two and a few people are anti semetic (against jews) yet conceal in the back of being anti zionists
2016-12-30 08:54:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by schwager 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're able to collect a large material relatively easy. Also the answers are easier to process.
2006-12-13 07:43:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cold Bird 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
you can word the Qs to swing the response in the direction you want it to go.
2006-12-13 07:40:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by dsclimb1 5
·
0⤊
2⤋