2006-12-13 07:19:42 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
yeah bledsoe sucks cowboys need to get rid of him
2006-12-13 07:23:05 · answer #1 · answered by witherspoon2007 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm not sure it's a question of being "better" than Bledsoe. You have to remember, Drew Bledsoe is in the top 10 for his career for several key passing statistics. He's been a pretty good quarterback over the course of time.
The problem is that Bledsoe doesn't really fit with the Cowboys scheme. He doesn't just throw to one receiver. He wants to spread the ball around, and outside of Terry Glenn, the Cowboys don't have a receiver that can get open. T.O. is a joke, always short-arming passes and dropping wide-open bombs. The rest can't get out of coverage. That forces Bledsoe to hold the ball longer, and he's never been a good scrambling quarterback.
Tony Romo is performing at a high level because he has something to prove. He'll level off by the end of the regular season and we'll see what his long-term potential really is. He won't do much in a playoff game against other teams that have veterans running the show.
2006-12-13 15:31:43 · answer #2 · answered by T S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Romo is doing better because he is more mobile. The cowboys O-Line isn't that great so Bledsoe was getting killed. I really liked Bledsoe always have......I don't know why people are quick to dismiss.....hes a good QB...I was rooting for them sort of when he was the QB but now that hes not the starter I don't care about the cowboys.........
2006-12-13 15:31:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes for the time being Tony Romo is a better suit for the Cowboys. The only problem is that his inexperience as a starter my eventually hurt him in the long haul.
I bet the Cowboy's owners is kicking himself about giving Bledsoe a contract
2006-12-13 15:22:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Without a doubt! I think Romo has provided the renewed energy that Dallas needed. Bledsoe holds onto the ball too long!!! I think Romo is better outside the pocket and has some scrambling ability. I think Romo got his first taste of really being sacked last week, but I think is going to prove to be a great asset to the team down the road.
2006-12-13 15:24:00 · answer #5 · answered by justme 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. The fact that the team is winning more games means nothing...
In his heyday, Bledsoe was much better than Romo, but he just got old. Actually, I think Romo is better for the team, but he IS still a rookie. He needs to get the hang of the NFL before he becomes a good quarterback.
Which is why dem Saints walked all over him.
WHO DAT!
2006-12-13 15:20:46 · answer #6 · answered by i hate hippies but love my Jesus 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
due to the offensive line the cowboys have Romo is the better option now if you had the o-line the cowboys had in the early 90s then Bledsoe would be the better option.
2006-12-13 15:22:33 · answer #7 · answered by epjet19 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah...everyone is a better quarterback than Bledsoe
2006-12-13 15:21:10 · answer #8 · answered by Nik-Nak 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I only think he's better only because the Cowboys can't block for the pass.
For more on the Cowboys and the NFL, check this site out. http://factipedia.com/sportsblogs/
2006-12-13 15:22:53 · answer #9 · answered by Cleopatra S 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-12-13 15:47:46 · answer #10 · answered by Scottie Boy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋