They are:
Capoid or Khoisanid Subspecies of southern Africa
Congoid Subspecies of sub-Saharan Africa
Caucasoid or Europid Subspecies (Geographic distribution centered in the Caucasus mountains)
Australoid Subspecies
Mongoloid Subspecies
2006-12-13 07:20:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
White and black are not racial classifications, they are shades of skin color. Caucasian, *******, Asian, Semitic and Hispanic are often considered the primary racial types, but that too is misleading. Each of what we call 'races' is actually made up of many, many genetically diverse ancestors. For that reason, it's misleading to think of races as distinct groups.
2006-12-13 07:28:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Caucassion, Hispanic, Asian, Islander, Black,
2006-12-13 07:23:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by M.L.C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There were actually 9 racial groups - 1 original , 6 colored and 2 imported.
Urantia Book
2006-12-13 07:21:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by samssculptures 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
scientifically: ******* , caucasoid (caucus mountains), mongloid (mongolia, including native americans), australoid (australia)
what I hate about these classifications is that all of them, except *******, are named after the region of the world from which they're believed to originate. but ******* is based solely on skin color, and ***** is derived from the latin word 'necro' meaning dead. so screw these classification
2006-12-13 07:21:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Khujo 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
white, black, brown, yellow and fried.
2006-12-13 07:18:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dorothy and Toto 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
white, black, hispanic, asian, indian?
2006-12-13 07:18:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by diva 6
·
0⤊
0⤋