type yes if you think the neil armstong landing is real and no if you think it is a hoax
2006-12-13 06:42:35 · 11 answers · asked by Aroran 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I believe that we did land! im just doin a suvey
2006-12-13 13:36:59 · update #1
survey..................
2006-12-13 13:37:27 · update #2
yes I spelled Appollo wrong =)
2006-12-13 13:39:38 · update #3
Yes, I think Neil Armstrong landed on the moon although there are conspiracy theories that swirl around almost every major event in history. The "proof" of a fake moon landing that is offered by the conspiracy buffs is mostly a joke. Just consider the one wack job who's answer seems to suggest that it must have been a fake because the Apollo astronauts, Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins, didn't return from space with super powers!
The fake moon landing conspiracy, 9/11 conspiracy and Kennedy Assassination conspiracy stories were all hatched in the same nest from cracked eggs and are easily defeated by applying some common sense to the question.
2006-12-19 01:24:18 · answer #1 · answered by mjlehde@sbcglobal.net 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have an Apollo bicycle parked in the garage. it has a 24 speed derailleur gearset, indexed, which is far more that I need or want but just try to get a bike without that. It is not a hoax and neither were the Moon landings. Would the flag be "blowing" inside a sound stage if the landings were staged? How much wind is needed to make a flag fly? Do you get that amount of wind inside a building? Could it be that the flag was crumpled from being folded up? Since they said in the 1960s that the flag had a rod along the top to hold it out, and you can clearly see the rod in some of the photographs, then perhaps the flag story is meaningless. What is the weight of an astronaut with all his equipment on? What is the area of his boot print? Pressure = weight divided by area. What was the force exerted on the lunar surface by the rocket engines just before touchdown? The lunar descent module pilot had to throttle the motor back to prevent the module from rising. That measn the force exerted by the motor as it got close to the ground was far less than the weight of the module. Over what area was that force exerted? Five, ten square metres with the greatest force near the middle and weakening outwards? If you have seen the film taken from inside the module of the landing, you will notice a lot of dust being blown away from the surface. This dust was blown away from a fairly wide area. What was the pressure at the centre and the pressure at the edge of the area? The rocket motors would create a small depression in the surface, compared to what was there before, but is a shallow saucer like depression superimposed on what was a fairly uneven surface to start with. Therefore it does not show up. If you are referring to the feet of the lander, then the same equations apply. Pressure = weight divided by area. There are four feet, each of which is far larger than an astronaut's boot sole. In addition, the weight of the module bears straight down, the astronaut when walking exerts a force on the ground that can be resolved into vertical and horizontal components. Put crudely, he grinds his boot into the ground. The two situations are strictly not comparable with each other since the surface is powdery. Try it by blowing gently into a plate filled with dust.
2016-05-23 19:39:43 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is real, have you seen the video where they conduct Galileo's test by dropping a Hammer and a Feather at the same time, and they land at the same time? I saw it in Astronomy class. How could that be faked?
2006-12-13 06:46:53 · answer #3 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No (not real).
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but this one's just a little hard to swallow. How come only Americans have been to the moon? Why haven't we been back?
The Van Allen belts are the key. In the original 1960's Fantastic Four comic, that's how their rocket crashed and the team got their powers - cosmic radiation. We don't talk about it so much anymore.
2006-12-13 06:54:22 · answer #4 · answered by brainiac5 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes ...........I looked at the presented evidence.Having some photography exp myself it wasnt hard to debunk.And who put the laser reflector there that is used to this day to accurately measure distance? 9/11 on the other hand.............
2006-12-13 08:00:38 · answer #5 · answered by Paul I 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes
and you spelled Apollo wrong.
2006-12-13 06:51:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-12-13 06:54:40 · answer #7 · answered by JAMES H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definate yes there, seems there is a conspiricy theory for everythign anymore
2006-12-13 06:45:17 · answer #8 · answered by lethander_99 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course it's real.
2006-12-13 06:49:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
you need medication if you dont think we went to the moon
2006-12-13 06:50:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋