English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

holla!!

2006-12-13 16:35:19 · answer #1 · answered by Stacy B 2 · 0 0

Definately NOT me...Bush has done everything he should have! If we didn't go into Iraq, who knows what else could have happened? Thousands of iraqi girls have the priviledge to go to school now, and thousands of women have the right to vote, along with all the men. They are in a much better place right now, and the U.S. troops are doing their duty, and darn well might I add. I hate it when people are like "My son got killed in Iraq, and it's all Bush's fault!" Well, sorry to break it to your tiny little pea-picken hearts, but there is no draft. They signed up for the responsibility and knew what might happen! Bush has also done the right thing to help prevent some of the illegal immigration! Well, I think Bush has done an excellent job and I hope and pray that we get a Republican in office for '08 as well. Who knows what might happen if we get a Democrat like Hillary or Barak...
Ciao for now,
Tara

2006-12-13 16:36:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'll agree with only p, seems more scary what might be coming in instead of whats leaving Soul Searcher, hate to break it to you, but Cynthia Mckinney didn't show up for work most of the time, I guess that is why she got defeated last month. Can't trust the words of somebody that doesn't serve the people the way she was supposed to do. It's kind of funny, she wanted the President fired, but in the end, she was the one to get fired by the voters.

2006-12-13 14:38:42 · answer #3 · answered by tim g 3 · 0 0

Yes! Look at the Bush Countdown to Leaving Office clock: http://bushclock.lose.com/

2006-12-13 14:05:18 · answer #4 · answered by mrjohntesh 3 · 1 1

I am sure there are a lot of them who want Bush to leave office, they are the same ones who will not vote in the next elections but cry and complain about who is in office.

2006-12-13 14:18:27 · answer #5 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 0 1

There are many who want to see the U.S. have a different strategy in Iraq, and I'm sure said people are looking forward to having someone else in the White House.

Same with those who want different policies on immigration, the separation between church and state, an end to skyrocketing budget deficits, an end to illegal wiretapping without warrants by our government, and any number of other issue areas.

2006-12-13 14:26:01 · answer #6 · answered by Dave of the Hill People 4 · 0 1

Not me. He's been a half-asked Conservative with no sense of border responsibilities and no party leadership. But the alternative is way worse. I haven't heard a Democrat yet tell me what they plan to do. Except Nancy who keeps changing her mind.

2006-12-13 14:17:58 · answer #7 · answered by Zee HatMan 3 · 0 0

I can wait. Please, wait for impeachment until Cheney is convicted. Please wait until we have a clearer idea of what, exactly, he is guilty of. Let us be reasonably sure there is enough incontrovertable evidence to assure a conviction.

There are some decent Republicans in Congress who will buck the party line if the proof is there, more than one who could lead a caretaker govt until his term ends. And , please, not John Mc Cain. Some from the link below might be a good place to start looking.

http://patriotsquestion911.com/

2006-12-13 14:20:35 · answer #8 · answered by bob h 5 · 0 1

Floridian bush is ready to take over

2006-12-13 14:00:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes.
Cynthia McKinney's Full Remarks on Bush Impeachment Bill

Mr. Speaker:

I come before this body today as a proud American and as a servant of the American people, sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States.

Throughout my tenure, I've always tried to speak the truth. It's that commitment that brings me here today.

We have a President who has misgoverned and a Congress that has refused to hold him accountable. It is a grave situation and I believe the stakes for our country are high.

No American is above the law, and if we allow a President to violate, at the most basic and fundamental level, the trust of the people and then continue to govern, without a process for holding him accountable, what does that say about our commitment to the truth? To the Constitution? To our democracy?

The trust of the American people has been broken. And a process must be undertaken to repair this trust. This process must begin with honesty and accountability.

Leading up to our invasion of Iraq, the American people supported this Administration's actions because they believed in our President. They believed he was acting in good faith. They believed that American laws and American values would be respected. That in the weightiness of everything being considered, two values were rock solid: trust and truth.

From mushroom clouds to African yellow cake to aluminum tubes, the American people and this Congress were not presented the facts, but rather were presented a string of untruths, to justify the invasion of Iraq.


President Bush, along with Vice President Cheney and then-National Security Advisor Rice, portrayed to the Congress and to the American people that Iraq represented an imminent threat, culminating with President Bush's claim that Iraq was six months away from developing a nuclear weapon. Having used false fear to buy consent, the President then took our country to war.

This has grave consequences for the health of our democracy, for our standing with our allies, and most of all, for the lives of our men and women in the military and their families--who have been asked to make sacrifices--including the ultimate sacrifice--to keep us safe.

Just as we expect our leaders to be truthful, we expect them to abide by the law and respect our courts and judges. Here again, the President failed the American people.

When President Bush signed an executive order authorizing unlawful spying on American citizens, he circumvented the courts, the law, and he violated the separation of powers provided by the Constitution. Once the program was revealed, he then tried to hide the scope of his offense from the American people by making contradictory, untrue statements.

President George W. Bush has failed to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States; he has failed to ensure that senior members of his administration do the same; and he has betrayed the trust of the American people.

With a heavy heart and in the deepest spirit of patriotism, I exercise my duty and responsibility to speak truthfully about what is before us. To shy away from this responsibility would be easier. But I have not been one to travel the easy road. I believe in this country, and in the power of our democracy. I feel the steely conviction of one who will not let the country I love descend into shame; for the fabric of our democracy is at stake.

Some will call this a partisan vendetta, others will say this is an unimportant distraction to the plans of the incoming Congress. But this is not about political gamesmanship.

I am not willing to put any political party before my principles.

This, instead, is about beginning the long road back to regaining the high standards of truth and democracy upon which our great country was founded.

Mr. Speaker:

Under the standards set by the United States Constitution, President Bush, along with Vice President Cheney, and Secretary of State Rice, should be subject to the process of impeachment, and I have filed H. Res.1106 in the House of Representatives.

To my fellow Americans, as I leave this Congress, it is in your hands to hold your representatives accountable, and to show those with the courage to stand for what is right, that they do not stand alone.

Thank you.

(Reprinted courtesy, Atlanta Progressive News)

2006-12-13 14:00:40 · answer #10 · answered by soulsearcher 5 · 0 2

Many, but I'm not 1 of them.

2006-12-13 14:52:21 · answer #11 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers