2006-12-13 04:54:31 · 16 answers · asked by Jon P 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I don't think so. I think the powers that be just didn't want Michigan in it. If USC had won, they would've went and Florida would've stayed behind Michigan. I hope Florida gets absolutely smoked my OSU. They're mediocre at best.
2006-12-13 04:57:20 · answer #1 · answered by Gary H 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is a great question. I agree with most of the answers to the fact that the only reason Florida jumped ahead of Michigan is because of the voters not wanting a rematch, especially two teams from the Big Ten. This was simply a financial move in which now we will have teams from different conferences and different parts of the country involved in the championship. I am by no means a Michigan fan(go Illini), but I still think they got screwed by money.
2006-12-13 13:06:46 · answer #2 · answered by cubswin03 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah i think so...but USC might have been in the Title game...and then Florida and Michigan would be playing...Either way i think Michigan is where they should be...no matter the outcome of the USC or Florida game..unless they both had loss...But i see Florida Edgeing out OSU with there Defense...Michigan beating USC soundly...and that will start a new series of who should have been playing who for what...so its a never ending argument.
2006-12-13 13:00:30 · answer #3 · answered by Pierced00 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Possibly. And had USC won, odds are the bowls would have been Florida vs. Notre Dame in the Sugar and Michigan vs. LSU in the Rose.
2006-12-13 13:15:45 · answer #4 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't think so.
I ponder that the only reason Florida moved ahead of Michigan was because the BCS Bowlsters didn't want to see Ohio State play Michigan again.
2006-12-13 12:58:02 · answer #5 · answered by BigDozer66 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Honestly they may have. I mean they had the same Computer rankings. Here is the thing that may give FSU a SLIGHT advantage. They played a game and WON. So with Michigan not playing Florida may have just gotten ahead. I think it would have been close though.
2006-12-13 13:15:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Carr is a whiny wh*re who is just mad b/c Tressel dusts the floor with his old cratchety a** every year. Like someone else said, Florida was that close to Michigan and still had two games to play to finish their schedule. How can they not recieve points for winning two more games to finish their schedule??? Someone should go change Carr's depends!!
2006-12-14 03:55:13 · answer #7 · answered by willyc 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does it really matter, Michigan people are still crying and if they win New years Day, the crying will get louder. The only good Michigan fan is a quit one. GOOOOO BUCKS #1
2006-12-14 12:40:48 · answer #8 · answered by Thumper 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes usc has no effect on florida passing Michigan they would still effect them
2006-12-13 16:20:31 · answer #9 · answered by theoneandonly4251 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a chance, USC just needed to win out and they would've gotten that #2 spot
2006-12-14 11:37:04 · answer #10 · answered by RichMac82 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋