Can they technically be considered a "Hair Band" Why or Why not?
2006-12-13 04:21:42 · 8 answers · asked by Neea_Gastino 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
No. Hair bands like Warrant, Damn Yankees, Bon Jovi, etc. had one critical element to become hair bands, aisde from the hair, of course - the power ballad love song.
No such thing in Metallica's history, they are metal. Metal is different from Hair.
2006-12-13 04:25:20 · answer #1 · answered by Boatman 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't think they can technically be considered a hair band seen as the music they created wasn't they same as the music created by other hair bands.
2006-12-13 04:24:22 · answer #2 · answered by schizophrenic_cat 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Umm no. Best way to put it is Boy band metal. Metallica had long hair, but didn't have the sound or the image to back up that scene.
2006-12-13 04:26:45 · answer #3 · answered by Tyler C 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it was the era in which they were huge they were labeled a hair band! I guess if you consider them hair but personally, they were metal!
2006-12-13 04:33:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who gives a crap about their hair!???
Does the length of a band's hair alter what comes out of the speakers??? Err....no!
2006-12-13 05:23:48 · answer #5 · answered by Next evolutionary step... 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hair bands are only fashion rock, they never used make up or put acts on stage
2006-12-13 04:23:37 · answer #6 · answered by Ge 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The real question about Metallica is, "why did they sell out?"
2006-12-13 05:00:25 · answer #7 · answered by Thunderman9 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes because they like to let it hang
2006-12-13 04:24:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋