2006-12-13 03:15:31 · 14 answers · asked by naik a 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
If I could understand the question I would answer it.
2006-12-13 03:24:09 · answer #1 · answered by David H 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Since other party involve in the episode was awarded the punishment of suspension from few matches, in all fairness the same yardstick should have been followed in the case of Hair also in all fairness,
2006-12-14 01:17:01 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well he became very controversial and the ICC had lot of pressure and hence pulled the trigger on Hair's job.
2006-12-13 23:27:29 · answer #3 · answered by truth 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ya , suspending d.hair is a good thinking . and he is the enemy of the asian cricket teams
2006-12-13 18:28:53 · answer #4 · answered by faizan 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think not a good idea, that idea only came from 2-3 nations that wanted action, i think as a ump he was upthere not the best, but
2006-12-13 20:17:25 · answer #5 · answered by clubman77 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He may be good umpire but he is a arrogant one
2006-12-13 13:17:32 · answer #6 · answered by akband 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think that darrel hair is a racist and blind umpire against pakis and indis and west indies and other people, lol ban him, GOOOO NO . 1 umpire Simon Taufel !!!!
2006-12-13 16:16:19 · answer #7 · answered by moaiz 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes
2006-12-14 00:25:56 · answer #8 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How does it matter? One hair go another will come up. Isn't it.
2006-12-13 11:53:36 · answer #9 · answered by Titu66 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No not at all he is among the best umpires
2006-12-13 12:40:59 · answer #10 · answered by kunal j 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋