2006-12-13 02:58:59 · 6 answers · asked by kissmybum 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
judicial review is part of the checks and balances- it is constitutional
2006-12-13 03:03:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It has its good and bad sides. It's made the judicial branch much too powerful in my opinion but it's also the only way to insure that the legislature can't override constitutionally protected rights on a whim. Is it constitutional? It seems that we can interpret the constitution to mean anything we want nowadays.
2006-12-13 03:18:16 · answer #2 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously it's constitutional--someone has to rule on what is constitutional and that has been given to the Supreme Court by the constitution. It is good because sometimes the majority just doesn't feel like being fair, and needs a check against their power to hinder the freedom of those in the minority opinion.
2006-12-13 03:03:28 · answer #3 · answered by wayfaroutthere 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok, i do not comprehend if those graphs are the reality or no longer because the authorities lies about this manner of excellent type of issues... yet i comprehend this: i'd assume that the regularly occurring criminal, being uneducated as lots of them are, doesn't have any idea what number of human beings were positioned to lack of existence this 12 months or 10 years in the past. i'd also go so some distance as to assume that many criminals maximum in all possibility do not even comprehend the position their state stands on the shortcoming of existence penalty. also, i imagine maximum folk do not dedicate murders wondering that they'll get stuck. So in case you do not imagine you receives stuck, then why would you care about the shortcoming of existence penalty? on the different area there are those who do not plan a homicide, yet particularly do it out of uncontrollable anger contained in the instantaneous, i'd imagine that those persons are also not to any extent further wondering about the shortcoming of existence penalty, yet are purely fed on with anger. So, to respond to the question, no. i do not imagine the shortcoming of existence penalty does something to diminish destiny murders. also i'd upload, at the same time as some human beings sense that the shortcoming of existence penalty is so terrible... i imagine existence in detention center sounds even worse. edit - i will check out that e book, it sounds exciting.
2016-11-26 00:51:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not just good and constitutional, it's imperative to our functioning republic.
2006-12-13 03:10:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's abused. I would rather have laws written by elected legislators rather than unelected judges.
2006-12-13 04:19:56 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋