English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

since i have seen that so many people think it is helpful for a couple to know each other, i still doubt about the consequence of this behavior. i wonder if it is a debate, the pros will probably be the winner?

2006-12-13 01:29:18 · 12 answers · asked by kangaroo 1 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

12 answers

Yes the pros would win. There is absoloutely zero negative consequences I can think of. If things don't work out you are free to leave without legal obligations in your way.

2006-12-13 01:32:16 · answer #1 · answered by Craiova 5 · 0 0

has any one done any research to find out how many cohabiting couples actually ended up getting married? You don't have forever to do experiments with your life. Once you cohabitate, what's the use of getting married? What are the things you will do differently when you cohabitate as opposed to when you are married? I think the pros will win if this is to be a debate - because there are more people who want sex for free.

2006-12-13 10:03:24 · answer #2 · answered by seeker 3 · 1 0

It just makes you wonder what the point of getting married is when you're already living the life. Nothing would change for the fact you've gotten married, it doesn't seem very special anymore.

There's something very romantic about moving in after the wedding, starting your new life together like that.

Although in this day and age, it's not very practical is it? Weddings and houses are so expensive, paying for both at the same time is just too difficult in most cases.

2006-12-13 11:44:38 · answer #3 · answered by - 5 · 0 0

The Pros are that two people can get to know each other and how they will get along before making the lifelong legal commitment to marry. If in time they find they cannot stand each other, then they just move on. The Cons are supposed to be that by the time they get around to marriage, there is no joy of "discovery"- they already know the intimate mysteries of one another.

2006-12-13 09:35:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think if you intend to marry the person you cohabit ate with then their should be no problem.I think it would cause problems if you had been sleeping around (which applies to both parties).
Maybe I am old fashioned in this respect but I feel you must have respect for each other in this area.

2006-12-13 09:59:45 · answer #5 · answered by Rasputin the Mad Monk 1 · 0 0

Yes. You start to get on each others nerves sooner. The whole idea of getting married is to spend every single, year, month, week, day, hour and second with each other until death do you two part! YIKES! What's the rush? Wait unitl you sign the marriage certificate then move in.

22 years and counting................

2006-12-13 09:47:11 · answer #6 · answered by Speedoguy 3 · 2 0

trust me from personal experience, you would never get married if you live together long enough. you get comfortable just living under the same roof and then before you know it, three years or more have passed, and you still don't have a ring on your finger,
yet you are officially off the market, so i think it is a bad deal all the way around.

2006-12-13 09:34:29 · answer #7 · answered by lrfoster7 5 · 2 0

Yes, Pregnancy.

2006-12-13 09:45:00 · answer #8 · answered by quilm 3 · 0 0

All the pros are in favor of the man.

2006-12-13 09:32:37 · answer #9 · answered by elgil 7 · 2 0

Yes only this one: You will be a cow giving free milk. So why buy the cow?

2006-12-13 09:36:35 · answer #10 · answered by iraqidesertmp 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers