No, that wasn't the topic of the question. The reason for the title is merely a social experiment I decided to enact on my own behalf. It's only purpose is to see just what kind of attendance a question with a title similar to this: heavily one sided and volatile, would have on answerer turnout.
2006-12-13 00:34:23 · 14 answers · asked by Huey Freeman 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Shouldn't this be a survey? I appreciate that you stated your motive and purpose for placing it in the 'politics' category, which is why I'm being more passive and assertive, as opposed to being aggressive and demeaning. He sucks enough I guess, to earn my concern. I really never thought of putting a ratio or scale o' suckiness on anyone or anything, so that's the best I can do for ya. I hope it helped... I admire the concept of social experimentation on these types of forums, and am in fact engaging in one right now, in order to observe and note the effects and interactions. GOOD LUCK!
2006-12-13 01:31:44 · answer #1 · answered by Rick R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is in response to Ouzian4ev's answer, he said that he made it safer for Americans so no more terrorist will kill more innocent people. Do you really not know how many of "our" troops are being killed because of Bush's decision to go to Iraq? I'm proud of my husband and all the other troops for serving our country but they really shouldn't be there. 9/11 was a sad day but we sunk as low as the terrorists by going over there to try and fix the problems they have. How many deaths will it take before everyone's happy?
2006-12-13 09:37:54 · answer #2 · answered by Coffee Lover 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Next time just create another profile, and then ask it without your intentions.
That way more people will actually answer it
but to answer your question, as a conservative, he is not my favorite guy at all, but he is not nearly as bad as the libbies make him sound
2006-12-13 08:54:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just watch David letterman and watch the segment of presidential speeches.
2006-12-13 08:37:10 · answer #4 · answered by Wael 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
actually he doesn't as you must asak a question per tos or the yahoo cops come a barging in! So No he just licks around the edges
2006-12-13 08:54:49 · answer #5 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Baby chickens
2006-12-13 08:47:11 · answer #6 · answered by Rich B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He doesn't. He made Americans more safer and attacked the extremists who could have claimed more of their innocent lives.
2006-12-13 09:06:04 · answer #7 · answered by Ouzian4ever 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would have been more fun if you just posted the question without the explanation.
2006-12-13 08:36:47 · answer #8 · answered by Faux News 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Allot. It's the one thing he's good at. He's a natural.
2006-12-13 13:54:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
interesting.... let me do my own experiment then:
Will a pointless answer still get me 2 points?
probably will...
2006-12-13 08:53:38 · answer #10 · answered by Nic 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋