English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-12 23:51:01 · 8 answers · asked by Sonstraal 2 in Entertainment & Music Movies

8 answers

Haven't seen it yet, but then again, I am not much of a movie person. Let me know if you like it.

2006-12-12 23:53:22 · answer #1 · answered by candra_calhoon 3 · 0 0

I thought it was pretty ok. Not the best James Bond movie, like they are saying on the TV. Just not enough cool Bond gadgets!! And, the girls werent as WOW as in previous years. You come to expect a thrilling movie, full of cliches, modelesque women and cool gadgets. Just wasnt the same. I thought he was a pretty good Bond however, still loved sexy Pierce Brosnen.... Yum!

2006-12-13 00:00:58 · answer #2 · answered by thelaundryfairy 3 · 0 0

It wasn't bad. Not the BEST 007 movie ever, but OK. The story line was a little erratic I thought (just my opinion). I think the one I enjoyed the most was Never say Never. Daniel Craig has a nice bum though! (although I thought Sean Connery was the best 007 ever! The role just suited him somehow. I even liked Pierce Brosman, but not as much as Sean) In fact, I have NEVER seen a bad Sean Connery movie!

2006-12-13 00:03:37 · answer #3 · answered by dragonfly 4 · 0 0

Casino Royale premiered at the Odeon Leicester Square, the Odeon West End and the Empire simultaneously in London on November 14, 2006. It marked the 60th Royal Film Performance and benefited the Cinema & Television Benevolent Fund (CTBF), whose patron, Queen Elizabeth II, was in attendance with the Duke of Edinburgh. It was the third James Bond premiere that the Queen had attended following You Only Live Twice (1967) and Die Another Day (2002). [21] [22] Along with the cast and crew, numerous celebrities and 5,000 paying guests were also in attendance with half the proceeds benefiting the CTBF.


[edit] Critics
Reviewers gave a very positive response to the film, especially to Craig's performance. Rotten Tomatoes gave the movie an aggregate rating of 95%, the highest rating for a wide-release of the year. The Users' rating was 92%.[23] Metacritic gave the movie a Metascore of 80 signifying "Generally Favorable Reviews." The movie has also attained a weighted average of 8.0/10 from IMDB users. The Daily Mirror (which had once run a front page news story critical of Craig, with the headline, The name's Bland - James Bland) and The Daily Telegraph compared him to Sean Connery, and the latter praised the script as smartly written, the former noting how the film departed from the series' conventions. The Times also compared Craig to Timothy Dalton, and praised the action as edgy,[24] with another reviewer citing in particular the crane sequence in Madagascar.[25] Paul Arendt of BBC Films went higher in his praise, acclaiming Craig as the first actor to truly nail Ian Fleming's character.[26] Kim Newman of Empire[27] and Todd McCarthy of Variety agreed.[28] In North America, the movie was also tremendously well-received. MSNBC gave the movie a perfect 5 star rating. [29]

Michael Medved gave Casino Royale three stars (out of four) calling it "..intriguing, audacious and very original..". Medved further stated that it is "..more believable, less cartoonish, than previous 007 extravaganzas.", but the "..sometimes sluggish pacing will frustrate some Bond fanatics."[30]

A reviewer for The Sun praised the film for its darkness and Craig's performance although they felt "like the novel, it suffers from a lack of sharpness in the plot" and felt it required some editing.[31] A down note came from Tim Adams of The Observer who felt the film came off uncomfortably in an attempt to make the series grittier.[32] Emanuell Levy agreed, feeling the film's terrorist villains lacked depth, and the ending was long, although he praised Craig and gave the film a B+ overall.[33] Richard Roeper gave the film a 3 out of 4.

In a poll conducted by IMDb, Casino Royale was voted the best James Bond film ever.[1]


[edit] Box office
Opening day estimates in the United States and Canada show it on top with $14,750,000. Opening weekend estimates in the United States and Canada put it in second place with $40,600,000,[34] as well as earning another $42,000,000 internationally. Though Happy Feet won the weekend box office overall figures, Casino Royale, per theatre, out performed Happy Feet which was released in 370 more theatres. Also, Happy Feet, having little more than half the running time of Casino Royale, has had more showings per day. According to Box Office Mojo, Casino Royale acquired, on average, $11,890 per theatre, while Happy Feet grossed $10,918 per theatre. [35] [36]

United Kingdom ticket sales for the first day of release were GBP 1.7 million, the highest for any Bond film. The record was held previously by Die Another Day (GBP 1.1million).[37]. Weekend opening total in the UK was £13,400,000, beating the previous record of £9,100,000 held by Pierce Brosnan's Die Another Day. It became the third biggest opening weekend of all time, behind Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire and Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest. As of November 19th, the UK's intake is over $25,524,511.

Die Another Day's entire British intake ($59,000,000) has also been outgrossed by Casino Royale after only two weeks, having taken over $73,450,000.

The film has had the biggest Bond opening in the Republic of Ireland with over €1,100,000 in the first 2 weeks.

From November 16th to November 19th, the film took in over $43,407,886. The film has broken several records, including taking over Rs. 149,000,000 ($3,200,000) in the first three days of release in India, more than any other western film. In Russia, the film made over $3,800,000, the eighth largest opening for a non-Russian film. ,[38]. On November 26th the intake was updated, showing the box office intake outside the USA to be over $128,200,000.

Casino Royale opened at #1 in 27 countries, with a weekend gross of $43,407,886 dollars worldwide. [39] Casino Royale has so far grossed over $375,530,909 worldwide [40]

2006-12-13 01:39:05 · answer #4 · answered by wengkuen 4 · 0 0

I thought it was pretty good. It was worth seeing on the big screen.

2006-12-13 00:00:05 · answer #5 · answered by R J 7 · 0 0

It was fine.

2006-12-12 23:58:20 · answer #6 · answered by v 4 · 0 0

it was a good one.. superb..

2006-12-12 23:52:31 · answer #7 · answered by sweet sugar 3 · 0 0

its so nice... and so action

2006-12-13 00:00:44 · answer #8 · answered by toto 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers